Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001;15(2):71-5.
doi: 10.1002/jcla.4.

Histamine release test and measurement of antigen-specific IgE antibody in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctival diseases

Affiliations

Histamine release test and measurement of antigen-specific IgE antibody in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctival diseases

E Uchio et al. J Clin Lab Anal. 2001.

Abstract

Although systemic allergic laboratory tests for the quantification of allergen-specific serum IgE antibody have been widely used, in these tests a high titer of serum specific IgE does not necessarily indicate evidence of allergy. We evaluated the diagnostic value of the glass microfiber-based histamine release test (HRT) using small amounts of whole blood, in 36 cases of allergic conjunctival diseases: 17 cases of allergic conjunctivitis and 19 of atopic keratoconjunctivitis. The patients were evaluated by HRT, capsulated hydrolic carrier polymer (CAP)-RAST, and conjunctival provocation test (CPT) against ten allergens. The positive rates for all allergens were higher in CAP-RAST than in HRT. The mean concordance of HRT with CAP-RAST results was 0.789. The mean concordance of HRT with CPT was 0.892 and that of CAP-RAST with CPT was 0.693. A significantly higher concordance was observed in HRT than CAP-RAST for Japanese cedar and mite antigen. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of HRT were higher than those of CAP-RAST. These results indicate that CAP-RAST is good for the screening of allergens and that HRT has an advantage in the confirmation of clinical allergens in allergic conjunctival diseases because of its high sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, and higher concordance with CPT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • [Ocular allergies].
    Messmer EM. Messmer EM. Ophthalmologe. 2005 May;102(5):527-43; quiz 544. doi: 10.1007/s00347-005-1181-y. Ophthalmologe. 2005. PMID: 15806370 Review. German.

References

    1. Ceska M, Erikson R, Varga JM. 1972. Radioimmunosorbent test assay of allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 49:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Ewan PW, Coote D. 1990. ; Evaluation of a capsulated hydrolic carrier polymer (the ImmunoCAP) for measurement of specific IgE antibodies. Allergy 45:22–29. - PubMed
    1. Ownby DR, Bailey J. 1986. Comparison of MAST with radioallergosorbent and skin tests for diagnosis of allergy in children. Am J Dis Child 140:45–48. - PubMed
    1. Osterballe O, Malling HJ, Weeke B. 1979. Specific diagnosis of exogenous bronchial asthma in adults. Allergy 34:175–185. - PubMed
    1. Skov PS, Norn S, Weeke B. 1984. A new method for detecting histamine release. Agents Actions 14:414–416. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources