Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Apr;91(4):584-90.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.4.584.

Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: results from the Woman to Woman Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: results from the Woman to Woman Study

J D Allen et al. Am J Public Health. 2001 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: This article reports findings from a peer-delivered intervention designed to increase use of breast and cervical cancer screening.

Methods: Twenty-six worksites were randomly assigned to the intervention or comparison group. The 16-month intervention consisted of group discussions, outreach, and educational campaigns. Data were collected from a random sample of women employees stratified by age (baseline n = 2943; final n = 2747). Cross-sectional analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of the intervention on screening behaviors.

Results: Relative to comparison worksites, the intervention group experienced greater increases in the percentage of women who reported a recent mammogram (7.2% vs 5.6%), clinical breast examination (5.8% vs 2.1%), and Papanicolaou (Pap) test (4.7% vs 1.9%). After worksite cluster and age strata were controlled for, the observed increase in Pap tests was significantly greater in the intervention group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.62); however, differences in mammography screening rates (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.90, 1.44) and clinical breast examination (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 0.96, 1.49) were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Intervention activities produced a modest increase in cervical cancer screening, but they did not accelerate breast cancer screening rates above the observed secular trend.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Health Educ Q. 1982 Fall;9 Spec Suppl:61-72 - PubMed
    1. AAOHN J. 1998 Sep;46(9):443-51; quiz 452-3 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1989 Jul;172(1):243-6 - PubMed
    1. Prev Med. 1990 May;19(3):279-90 - PubMed
    1. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;339:281-302 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms