Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2001 Mar;173(3):218-23.
doi: 10.1055/s-2001-11608.

[Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma]

[Article in German]
M Funovics et al. Rofo. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of a computerassisted diagnosis (CAD) system (R2 linage Checker 1.2). Comparison of the results of three readers with and without knowledge of the computer results.

Materials and methods: The mammograms of 52 patients, bilaterally in two planes each, with histologically proven carcinoma of the breast were included in the study. They were first scanned by the CAD machine and subsequently read by three readers with different degrees of experience in two sessions with and without knowledge of the computer results.

Results: Of the 91 views of carcinomas, the readers detected 96%, 89%, and 85%, respectively. With CAD, the values rose to 97%, 93%, and 96%. The increase of the first observer was not significant. As for the 49 areas of malignant microcalcifications, the first reader showed a significant decrease of sensitivity, the other two readers showed no significant change. The sensitivity of CAD was 74% for masses and 86% for microcalcifications at a rate of 1.8 false positive markers per image. All but two tumors were correctly marked in at least one plane.

Conclusions: Use of the CAD machine led to a significant increase of sensitivity in the detection of malignant masses by two of three observers. In the case of malignant microcalcifications, and for the most experienced observer, CAD did not improve the results. The most important problem is the high rate of false positive markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms