[Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma]
- PMID: 11293863
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-11608
[Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma]
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of a computerassisted diagnosis (CAD) system (R2 linage Checker 1.2). Comparison of the results of three readers with and without knowledge of the computer results.
Materials and methods: The mammograms of 52 patients, bilaterally in two planes each, with histologically proven carcinoma of the breast were included in the study. They were first scanned by the CAD machine and subsequently read by three readers with different degrees of experience in two sessions with and without knowledge of the computer results.
Results: Of the 91 views of carcinomas, the readers detected 96%, 89%, and 85%, respectively. With CAD, the values rose to 97%, 93%, and 96%. The increase of the first observer was not significant. As for the 49 areas of malignant microcalcifications, the first reader showed a significant decrease of sensitivity, the other two readers showed no significant change. The sensitivity of CAD was 74% for masses and 86% for microcalcifications at a rate of 1.8 false positive markers per image. All but two tumors were correctly marked in at least one plane.
Conclusions: Use of the CAD machine led to a significant increase of sensitivity in the detection of malignant masses by two of three observers. In the case of malignant microcalcifications, and for the most experienced observer, CAD did not improve the results. The most important problem is the high rate of false positive markers.
Similar articles
-
[Evaluation of the primary diagnosis with a CAD-system in mammography].Rofo. 2003 Sep;175(9):1225-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41934. Rofo. 2003. PMID: 12964078 German.
-
Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology.Cancer. 2005 Sep 1;104(5):931-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21255. Cancer. 2005. PMID: 16047331
-
[Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 May;34(5):360-3. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012. PMID: 22883457 Chinese.
-
[The suitability of high-resolution ultrasound for the detection of DCIS].Ultraschall Med. 2007 Jun;28(3):307-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963222. Ultraschall Med. 2007. PMID: 17583840 Review. German.
-
Mammography: what's a woman to do?Johns Hopkins Med Lett Health After 50. 2002 Jun;14(4):4-5. Johns Hopkins Med Lett Health After 50. 2002. PMID: 12066794 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.J Digit Imaging. 2006 Sep;19(3):258-63. doi: 10.1007/s10278-006-0592-x. J Digit Imaging. 2006. PMID: 16741664 Free PMC article.
-
[Current situation and future perspectives of digital mammography].Radiologe. 2008 Apr;48(4):324-34. doi: 10.1007/s00117-008-1639-4. Radiologe. 2008. PMID: 18335192 Review. German.
-
Is the future of breast imaging with AI?Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4822-4824. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06286-6. Epub 2019 Jun 14. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31201524 No abstract available.
-
[Clinical results of digital mammography].Radiologe. 2005 Mar;45(3):255-63. doi: 10.1007/s00117-005-1175-4. Radiologe. 2005. PMID: 15744483 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous