Design considerations for efficient prostate cancer chemoprevention trials
- PMID: 11295629
- DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00976-6
Design considerations for efficient prostate cancer chemoprevention trials
Abstract
Prostate cancer, even with its substantial public health impact of 180,400 new cases and 31,900 deaths estimated for 2000, still has a very low annual incidence (0.27% for men 34.4 years and older), which makes designing and conducting efficient prostate cancer prevention trials a challenge. Definitive prevention trials with cancer endpoints, such as the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT), Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), and Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), require long trial duration (up to 12 years) and large sample size (up to 32,400 subjects) to accomplish their objectives. This article discusses design concepts for potential prostate cancer prevention trials that require fewer years, subjects, and resources to complete. Design elements, such as high-risk populations, randomization, surrogate endpoints, including quality-of-life endpoints, masking/blinding, and various clinical/statistical designs (including 1-way layout, all-versus-none, factorial, and adaptive designs), are discussed, along with the ultimate goal of gaining US Food and Drug Administration approval for prostate-cancer preventive agents that can improve public health by reducing prostate cancer incidence and mortality.
Similar articles
-
Prostate cancer chemoprevention: Strategies for designing efficient clinical trials.Urology. 2001 Apr;57(4 Suppl 1):224-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00981-x. Urology. 2001. PMID: 11295633
-
Executive Summary of the National Cancer Institute Workshop: Highlights and recommendations.Urology. 2001 Apr;57(4 Suppl 1):4-27. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00931-6. Urology. 2001. PMID: 11295590
-
SELECT: the selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial.Urol Oncol. 2003 Jan-Feb;21(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/s1078-1439(02)00301-0. Urol Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12684129 Review.
-
Randomized, controlled chemoprevention trials in populations at very high risk for prostate cancer: Elevated prostate-specific antigen and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.Urology. 2001 Apr;57(4 Suppl 1):185-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00970-5. Urology. 2001. PMID: 11295623 Clinical Trial.
-
Cancer risk factors for selecting cohorts for large-scale chemoprevention trials.J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1996;25:29-36. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1996. PMID: 9027595 Review.
Cited by
-
Evolving strategies for prostate cancer chemoprevention trials.World J Urol. 2003 May;21(1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-003-0317-4. Epub 2003 Apr 1. World J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12682772 Review.
-
Multitargeted low-dose GLAD combination chemoprevention: a novel and promising approach to combat colon carcinogenesis.Neoplasia. 2013 May;15(5):481-90. doi: 10.1593/neo.13282. Neoplasia. 2013. PMID: 23633920 Free PMC article.
-
Overcoming challenges in designing and implementing a phase II randomized controlled trial using a presurgical model to test a dietary intervention in prostate cancer.Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):262-72. doi: 10.1177/1740774508091676. Clin Trials. 2008. PMID: 18559416 Free PMC article.
-
Chemoprevention of prostate cancer: Natural compounds, antiandrogens, and antioxidants - In vivo evidence.J Carcinog. 2011;10:27. doi: 10.4103/1477-3163.90438. Epub 2011 Nov 30. J Carcinog. 2011. PMID: 22190869 Free PMC article.
-
North Central Cancer Treatment Group--achievements and perspectives.Semin Oncol. 2008 Oct;35(5):530-44. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2008.07.006. Semin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18929151 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical