Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 May;55(5):308-15.
doi: 10.1136/jech.55.5.308.

Prognostic factors in women with breast cancer: distribution by socioeconomic status and effect on differences in survival

Affiliations

Prognostic factors in women with breast cancer: distribution by socioeconomic status and effect on differences in survival

C S Thomson et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May.

Abstract

Study objective: To quantify and investigate differences in survival from breast cancer between women resident in affluent and deprived areas and define the contribution of underlying factors to this variation.

Design: Analysis of two datasets relating to breast cancer patients in Scotland: (1) population-based cancer registry data; (2) a subset of cancer registration records supplemented by abstraction of prognostic variables (stage, node status, tumour size, oestrogen receptor (ER) status, type of surgery, use of radiotherapy and use of adjuvant systemic therapy) from medical records.

Setting: Scotland.

Patients: (1) Cancer registration data on 21,751 women aged under 85 years diagnosed with primary breast cancer between 1978 and 1987; (2) national clinical audit data on 2035 women aged under 85 years diagnosed with primary breast cancer during 1987 for whom adequate medical records were available.

Main results: Survival differences of 10% between affluent and deprived women were observed in both datasets, across all age groups. In the audit dataset, the distribution of ER status varied by deprivation group (65% ER positive in affluent group v 48% ER positive in deprived group; under 65 age group). Women aged under 65 with non-metastatic disease were more likely to have breast conservation than a mastectomy if they were affluent (45%) than deprived (32%); the affluent were more likely to receive endocrine therapy (65%) than the deprived (50%). However, these factors accounted for about 20% of the observed difference in survival between women resident in affluent and deprived areas.

Conclusions: Deprived women with breast cancer have poorer outcomes than affluent women. This can only partly be explained by deprived women having more ER negative tumours than affluent women. Further research is required to identify other reasons for poorer outcomes in deprived women, with a view to reducing these survival differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Public Health Med. 1993 Jun;15(2):192-201 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):954-9 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1994 Oct 22;309(6961):1054-7 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1995 May 20;345(8960):1265-70 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1995 Jun 15;75(12):2946-53 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances