Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions
- PMID: 11298314
- DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.113267
Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine if any significant differences existed with regard to dental and skeletal asymmetries between subjects with Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions and subjects with normal occlusions. The sample consisted of 30 subjects in each of the 2 groups. Each possessed a full complement of permanent teeth, including first molars. The average age of subjects was 15.76 years in the Class II subdivision group and 22.42 years in the normal occlusion group. Measurements were obtained with the use of submentovertex, posteroanterior, and corrected oblique cephalometric radiographs. In the submentovertex radiographs, symmetry was assessed by measuring the relative differences in the spatial positions of dental and skeletal landmarks between the right and the left sides in both anteroposterior and transverse dimensions. Coordinate systems were used to represent the mandible, cranial floor, and the maxilla. In the posteroanterior radiographs, symmetry was assessed similarly by measuring the relative differences in the spatial positions of dental and skeletal landmarks between the right and the left sides. In the corrected oblique radiographs, symmetry was assessed by measuring the differences in size of dental and skeletal structures between the right and the left sides. Variables were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results demonstrated that the primary contributor to the differences between the 2 groups was the distal positioning of the mandibular first molars on the Class II side in patients whose mandibles showed no unusual skeletal or positional asymmetries. A secondary contributor was the mesial positioning of the maxillary first molars on the Class II side. Furthermore, the posteroanterior radiographic analysis showed that the more frequent distal positioning of the mandibular molars on the Class II side, compared with the mesial positioning of the maxillary molars on that side resulted in mandibular dental midline deviation to the Class II side more frequently than the maxillary dental midline to the opposite side.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of asymmetries between subjects with Class II subdivision and apparent facial asymmetry and those with normal occlusion.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Mar;129(3):376-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.002. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006. PMID: 16527633
-
Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.World J Orthod. 2009 Spring;10(1):7-15. World J Orthod. 2009. PMID: 19388427
-
Class II subdivision malocclusion types and evaluation of their asymmetries.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jan;131(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.031. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17208107
-
Class II malocclusion: mandibular retrusion or maxillary protrusion?Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):49-62. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0049:CIMMRO>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1995. PMID: 7726463 Review.
-
Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jan;113(1):40-50. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70275-6. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998. PMID: 9457018 Review.
Cited by
-
Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):80-8. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.080-088.oar. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 25279525 Free PMC article.
-
Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions.Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec 30;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0067-4. Prog Orthod. 2014. PMID: 25547371 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in third molar development and angulation in class II subdivision malocclusions.J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Jul;84(4):235-242. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00349-4. Epub 2021 Sep 29. J Orofac Orthop. 2023. PMID: 34586435 English.
-
Class II subdivision treatment with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device vs intermaxillary elastics.Angle Orthod. 2017 May;87(3):371-376. doi: 10.2319/070216-518.1. Epub 2016 Oct 13. Angle Orthod. 2017. PMID: 27762602 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Three-dimensional positional assessment of glenoid fossae and mandibular condyles in patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion.Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):847-854. doi: 10.2319/121216-890.1. Epub 2017 Sep 1. Angle Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28862492 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources