Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease
- PMID: 11300441
- DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01173-1
Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to perform a direct comparison between perfusion scintigraphic results and intracoronary-derived hemodynamic variables (fractional flow reserve [FFR]; absolute and relative coronary flow velocity reserve [CFVR and rCFVR, respectively]) in patients with two-vessel disease.
Background: There is limited information on the diagnostic accuracy of intracoronary-derived variables (CFVR, FFR and rCFVR) in patients with multivessel disease.
Methods: Dipyridamole technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed in 127 patients. The presence of reversible perfusion defects in the region of interest was determined. Within one week, angiography was performed; CFVR, rCFVR and FFR were determined in 161 coronary lesions after intracoronary administration of adenosine. The predictive value for the presence of reversible perfusion defects on MIBI SPECT of CFVR, rCFVR and FFR was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curves.
Results: The mean percentage diameter stenosis was 57% (range 35% to 85%), as measured by quantitative coronary angiography. Using per-patient analysis, the AUCs for CFVR (0.70 +/- 0.052), rCFVR (0.72 +/- 0.051) and FFR (0.76 +/- 0.050) were not significantly different (p = NS). The percentages of agreement with the results of MIBI SPECT were 76%, 78% and 77% for CFVR, rCFVR and FFR, respectively. Per-lesion analysis, using all 161 measured lesions, yielded similar results.
Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of three intracoronary-derived hemodynamic variables, as compared with the results of perfusion scintigraphy, is similar in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. Cut-offvalues of 2.0 for CFVR, 0.65 for rCFVR and 0.75 for FFR can be used for clinical decision-making in this patient cohort. Discordant results were obtained in 23% of the cases that require prospective evaluation for appropriate patient management.
Similar articles
-
Functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis by doppler derived absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in comparison with (99m)Tc MIBI SPECT.Heart. 1999 Oct;82(4):509-14. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.4.509. Heart. 1999. PMID: 10490570 Free PMC article.
-
Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity.Circulation. 2002 Jul 23;106(4):441-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000023041.26199.29. Circulation. 2002. PMID: 12135943 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenoses.J Nucl Cardiol. 2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):645-54. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.07.006. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16344226 Clinical Trial.
-
[Fractional and coronary flow reserve: intracoronary diagnosis of coronary artery disease]].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Sep 15;145(37):1782-8. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001. PMID: 11582640 Review. Dutch.
-
Assessment of coronary flow reserve using single photon emission computed tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tracers.J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):456-65. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.03.008. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 18513652 Review.
Cited by
-
Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure affects measurement of fractional flow reserve.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;14(4):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013. PMID: 23886870 Free PMC article.
-
Objective Identification of Intermediate Lesions Inducing Myocardial Ischemia Using Sequential Intracoronary Pressure and Flow Measurements.J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jul 7;9(13):e015559. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015559. Epub 2020 Jun 23. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32573324 Free PMC article.
-
Coronary flow: clinical considerations.Heart. 2003 Apr;89(4):361-3. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.4.361. Heart. 2003. PMID: 12639853 Free PMC article.
-
Tc-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Feb;26(2):203-13. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9510-x. Epub 2009 Sep 16. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010. PMID: 19760091
-
Invasive coronary physiology: a Dutch tradition.Neth Heart J. 2020 Aug;28(Suppl 1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01461-7. Neth Heart J. 2020. PMID: 32780339 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous