Reassessment of lymphocytic atypia in the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides
- PMID: 11301344
- DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880304
Reassessment of lymphocytic atypia in the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides
Abstract
The manifestations of mycosis fungoides in its early stage may mimic clinically and histologically those of many benign inflammatory dermatoses. Therefore, the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides remains a major challenge for dermatologists and dermatopathologists. For many years, it has been proposed that atypical lymphocytes within the epidermis constitute one of the diagnostic features in mycosis fungoides. Presence of dermal atypical lymphocytes remains controversial as a diagnostic criterion. We reassessed the feasibility of applying lymphocytic atypia within epidermis and dermis as diagnostic criteria discriminating between mycosis fungoides and spongiotic dermatitis. Thirty cases of mycosis fungoides and 30 cases of spongiotic dermatitis were retrieved from archival hematoxylin and eosin-stained histologic sections. Punch biopsy sections were examined by light microscopy; epidermal and dermal lymphocytes were photographed at 1000x (oil immersion). A total of 92 ektachrome slides (35 mM) were developed, coded, and ordered randomly. For each slide, cells were interpreted as typical or atypical lymphocytes by seven pathologists. Atypical epidermal lymphocytes were judged to be present in 9 +/- 2 out of 16 (56%) cases of mycosis fungoides photographed as compared with 8 +/- 3 out of 16 (50%) in spongiotic dermatitis. Dermal lymphocytic atypia was thought to be present in 14 +/- 6 out of 30 (47%) patients with mycosis fungoides. Thirteen +/- 6 out of 30 (43%) patients with non-mycosis fungoides also displayed dermal lymphocytic atypia. No statistical significance was observed in these comparisons (t test, P >.05). Furthermore, atypia of lymphocytes was deemed to be present in 41, 38, 59, 70, 23, 47, and 40 out of 92 slides examined by the investigators, suggesting that observer variation is a very significant factor in our present study. We conclude that it is not possible to distinguish mycosis fungoides from spongiotic dermatitis merely based on lymphocytic atypia within epidermis or dermis.
Similar articles
-
In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of mycosis fungoides: A preliminary study.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Sep;57(3):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.02.026. Epub 2007 Apr 16. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007. PMID: 17433849
-
Value of the CD8-CD3 ratio for the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides.Mod Pathol. 2003 Sep;16(9):857-62. doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000084112.81779.BB. Mod Pathol. 2003. PMID: 13679448
-
Profiles of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in eczematous dermatitis, psoriasis vulgaris and mycosis fungoides.Br J Dermatol. 2008 Jun;158(6):1256-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08504.x. Epub 2008 Mar 20. Br J Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18363755
-
Practical Aspects Regarding the Histopathological Diagnosis of Early Mycosis Fungoides.Rom J Intern Med. 2016 Jan-Mar;54(1):3-10. doi: 10.1515/rjim-2016-0001. Rom J Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27141565 Review.
-
Histologic mimickers of mycosis fungoides: a review.J Cutan Pathol. 2007 Jul;34(7):519-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2006.00662.x. J Cutan Pathol. 2007. PMID: 17576330 Review.
Cited by
-
Differentiating mycosis fungoides lesions from their mimickers clinically and histologically: A single tertiary center retrospective analysis in Saudi Arabia.Saudi Med J. 2024 Dec;45(12):1355-1367. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.12.20240796. Saudi Med J. 2024. PMID: 39658107 Free PMC article.
-
[Clues in dermatopathological diagnostics].Pathologie (Heidelb). 2025 Mar;46(2):81-89. doi: 10.1007/s00292-024-01400-y. Epub 2024 Dec 9. Pathologie (Heidelb). 2025. PMID: 39652123 Review. German.
-
The Histological Spectrum of Early Mycosis Fungoides: A Study of 58 Saudi Arab patients.Oman Med J. 2012 Mar;27(2):134-9. doi: 10.5001/omj.2012.28. Oman Med J. 2012. PMID: 22496939 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical