Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Apr 14;322(7291):898-901.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7291.898.

Randomised controlled trial of Helicobacter pylori testing and endoscopy for dyspepsia in primary care

B C Delaney  1 , S Wilson, A Roalfe, L Roberts, V Redman, A Wearn, F D Hobbs
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised controlled trial of Helicobacter pylori testing and endoscopy for dyspepsia in primary care

B C Delaney et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the cost effectiveness of a strategy of near patient Helicobacter pylori testing and endoscopy for managing dyspepsia.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 31 UK primary care centres.

Participants: 478 patients under 50 years old presenting with dyspepsia of longer than four weeks duration.

Interventions: Near patient testing for H pylori and open access endoscopy for patients with positive results. Control patients received acid suppressing drugs or specialist referral at general practitioner's discretion.

Main outcome measures: Cost effectiveness based on improvement in symptoms and use of resources at 12 months; quality of life.

Results: 40% of the study group tested positive for H pylori. 45% of study patients had endoscopy compared with 25% of controls. More peptic ulcers were diagnosed in the study group (7.4% v 2.1%, P=0.011). Paired comparison of symptom scores and quality of life showed that all patients improved over time with no difference between study and control groups. No significant differences were observed in rates of prescribing, consultation, or referral. Costs were higher in the study group ( 367.85 pound sterling v 253.16 pound sterling per patient).

Conclusions: The test and endoscopy strategy increases endoscopy rates over usual practice in primary care. The additional cost is not offset by benefits in symptom relief or quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile
Figure 2
Figure 2
Numbers of participants having open and direct access endoscopy in study and control groups
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Asante M, Lord J, Mendall M, Northfield T. Endoscopy for Helicobacter pylori seronegative young dyspeptic patients: an economic evaluation based on a randomized trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11(8):851–856. - PubMed
    1. Axon ATR, Bell GD, Jones RH, Quine MA, McCloy RF. Guidelines on appropriate indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. BMJ. 1995;310:853–856. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiba N, Lahaie R, Fedorak RN, Bailey R, Veldhuyzen vZS, Bernucci B. Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease. Current evidence for management strategies. Can Fam Physician. 1998;44:1481–1488. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sobala GM, Crabtree JE, Pentith JA, Rathbone BJ, Shallcross TM, Wyatt JI, et al. Screening dyspepsia by serology to Helicobacter pylori. Lancet. 1991;338:94–96. - PubMed
    1. Patel P, Khulusi S, Mendall MA, Lloyd R, Jazrawi R, Maxwell JD, et al. Prospective screening of dyspeptic patients by Helicobacter pylori serology. Lancet. 1995;346:1315–1318. - PubMed

Publication types