Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Apr;233(4):509-14.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200104000-00005.

Denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute recovers intraluminal acidity with time

Affiliations

Denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute recovers intraluminal acidity with time

C Gutschow et al. Ann Surg. 2001 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute recovers normal intraluminal acidity with time.

Summary background data: Bilateral truncal vagotomy to the stomach as an esophageal substitute reduces both gastric acid production and antral motility, but a spontaneous motor recovery process takes place over years.

Methods: Intraluminal gastric pH and bile were monitored during a 24-hour period 1 to 195 months after transthoracic elevation of the stomach as esophageal replacement in 91 and 76 patients, respectively. Nine patients underwent a second gastric pH monitoring after a 3-year period. The percentages of time that the gastric pH was less than 2 and bile absorbance exceeded 0.25 were calculated in reference to values from 25 healthy volunteers. Eighty-nine upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed in 83 patients. Patients were divided into three groups depending on length of follow-up: group 1, less than 1 year; group 2, 1 to 3 years; group 3, more than 3 years.

Results: The prevalence of a normal gastric pH profile was 32.3% in group 1, 81.5% in group 2, and 97.6% in group 3. The percentage of time that the gastric pH was less than 2 increased from group 1 (27.3%) to group 2 (56.1%) and group 3 (70.5%), parallel to an increase in the prevalence of cervical heartburn and esophagitis. The percentage of time that the gastric pH was less than 2 increased from 28.7% to 81.2% in the nine patients investigated twice. Exposure of the gastric mucosa to bile was 12.8% in patients with a high gastric pH profile versus 19.3% in those with normal acidity. In the esophageal remnant in six patients, Barrett's metaplasia developed, intestinal (n = 2) or gastric (n = 4) in type.

Conclusions: Early after vagotomy, intraluminal gastric acidity is reduced in two thirds of patients, but the stomach recovers a normal intraluminal pH profile with time, so that in more than one third of patients, disabling cervical heartburn and esophagitis develop. The potential for the development of Barrett's metaplasia in the esophageal remnant brings into question the use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute in benign and early neoplastic disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. Global evolution of intragastric pH (% time gastric pH < 2) with time (thick horizontal line, fifth percentile of the 25 healthy volunteers).
None
Figure 2. Prevalence of patients with a normoacidic gastric pH profile in the three groups studied.
None
Figure 3. Percentage of time that gastric pH was less than 2 at 24-hour gastric pH monitoring in controls and the three groups studied.
None
Figure 4. Percentage of time that gastric pH was less than 2 in the nine patients who underwent a second 24-hour gastric pH examination after a 3-year period.
None
Figure 5. Percentage of time that gastric bile absorbance exceeded 0.25, according to whether the gastric pH profile was hypoacidic (left) or normoacidic (right).
None
Figure 6. Prevalence of combined grade 2 and 3 reflux symptoms (top) and of macroscopic esophagitis at endoscopy (bottom) in the three groups studied.

References

    1. Dragstedt LR, Harper PV, Tovee EB, et al. Section of the vagus nerves to the stomach in the treatment of peptic ulcer. Ann Surg 1947; 146: 687–708. - PubMed
    1. Hölscher AH, Voit H, Buttermann G, et al. Function of the intrathoracic stomach as esophageal replacement. World J Surg 1988; 12: 835–844. - PubMed
    1. Bonavina L, Anselmino M, Ruol A, et al. Functional evaluation of the intrathoracic stomach as an esophageal substitute. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 529–532. - PubMed
    1. Okada N, Sakurai T, Tsuchihashi S, et al. Gastric functions in patients with the intrathoracic stomach after esophageal surgery. Ann Surg 1986; 204: 114–121. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christensen J. The enteric nervous system. In: Kumar D, Wingate D, eds. An illustrated guide to gastrointestinal motility. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1993, 10–31.

Publication types

MeSH terms