Gynecologists' patterns of prescribing pessaries
- PMID: 11304859
Gynecologists' patterns of prescribing pessaries
Abstract
Objective: To determine how gynecologists in the United States prescribe pessaries.
Study design: A 34-question (long) survey was sent to 2,000 gynecologists. Those who did not respond were then sent a five-question (short) survey.
Results: Nine hundred forty-seven (47.3%) long and short questionnaires were returned. Eighty-six percent of gynecologists prescribe pessaries. Most received minimal or no training in pessaries in their residencies. The most common pessaries used were the ring and doughnut. Uterine prolapse was treated most often with the Gellhorn and doughnut pessaries. The cube and Gellhorn pessaries were thought to be the most effective for vaginal vault prolapse. The Gehrung and ring pessaries were thought to be most effective for correction of cystocele. However, the ring pessary was considered the easiest to use. Follow-up visits were most often performed at one week, one month and then every three months. Estrogen was used in most cases.
Conclusion: Most gynecologists prescribe pessaries. The ring pessary is used most often and is deemed the easiest to use. Pessaries are thought to work for all pelvic organ prolapse defects but are thought to be less effective for posterior defects. Follow-up of patients differs from manufacturers' recommendations.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of vaginal pessary management: a UK-based survey.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Feb;29(2):129-31. doi: 10.1080/01443610902719813. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009. PMID: 19274547
-
Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;190(2):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.034. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 14981372
-
[Genital prolapse; treatment and course in four general practices].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Jul 17;148(29):1444-8. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004. PMID: 15326649 Dutch.
-
The role of the nurse in the use of vaginal pessaries to treat pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence: a literature review.Urol Nurs. 2005 Feb;25(1):41-8. Urol Nurs. 2005. PMID: 15779691 Review.
-
Pessary placement and management.Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000 Dec;46(12):40-5. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000. PMID: 11890135 Review.
Cited by
-
Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Sep;20(9):1023-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1. Epub 2009 Jun 16. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009. PMID: 19533009 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Analysis of questions by patients with pelvic organ prolapse about vaginal pessaries resulting in a checklist for their physicians.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jan;309(1):329-337. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07177-4. Epub 2023 Aug 19. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 37597024
-
Complications of neglected vaginal pessaries: case presentation and literature review.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1173-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0574-2. Epub 2008 Feb 27. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. PMID: 18301852 Review.
-
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD004010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 18;11:CD004010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub4. PMID: 23450548 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
The cube pessary: an underestimated treatment option for pelvic organ prolapse? Subjective 1-year outcomes.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1695-701. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2093-z. Epub 2013 Apr 12. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 23579291