Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause
- PMID: 11305086
- DOI: 10.1007/s001980170160
Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) measurement of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density (BMD) as defined according to the WHO classification. Two hundred and thirty-four healthy women aged 45-60 years were investigated. BMD was measured at the proximal and distal radius + ulna by pDXA and at the lumbar spine and femoral neck by DXA. There was a significant but moderate correlation between peripheral and axial BMD measurements, with r values ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 (SEE: 13.5-17%). The cutoff values for the proximal and distal radius BMD that allow the identification with 95% sensitivity of postmenopausal women with either a lumbar spine or femoral neck T-score < -1, corresponded to a T-score of +0.5 (proximal radius) and +1 (distal radius). More than 90% of the whole population had a peripheral T-score below these thresholds. Using an axial T-score < or = -2.5 as the definition of abnormality reduced to 48% (proximal radius) to 66% (distal radius) the number of women who would have required DXA axial measurements (i.e., with a pDXA T-score below the cutoff value of -0.7). Of the 33 women (14%) with a proximal radius T-score < or = -2.5 (osteoporosis), only 1 had a lumbar spine and femoral neck T-score > or = -1 (normal). Conversely, of the 50% (proximal radius) to 65% (distal radius) of the women with normal forearm measurement, 5% (proximal radius) to 9% (distal radius) were found to be osteoporotic and an additional 57% (proximal radius) to 59% (distal radius) could be classified as osteopenic (T-score between -1 and -2.5) at either the lumbar spine or femoral neck. In conclusion, use of pDXA forearm measurement as a prescreening tool in early postmenopausal women should allow the direct identification of about 50% of the women with no axial osteoporosis. However, this study highlights the difficulties in using a unique T-score that could be applied to different sites to diagnose osteoporosis.
Similar articles
-
Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?Osteoporos Int. 2003 Aug;14(8):688-93. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1420-5. Epub 2003 Jul 24. Osteoporos Int. 2003. PMID: 12897977
-
Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(9):1293-302. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0122-1. Epub 2006 Jun 30. Osteoporos Int. 2006. PMID: 16810454
-
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Dec;163(6):1435-40. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.6.7992742. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994. PMID: 7992742
-
Quantitative bone mineral assessment at the forearm: a review.Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(4):299-310. doi: 10.1007/s001980050068. Osteoporos Int. 1998. PMID: 10024899 Review.
-
The correlation between bone mineral density measured at the forearm and at the lumbar spine or femoral neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Feb 14;26(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08376-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 39953461 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Forearm T-score as a predictor of cage subsidence in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease following posterior single-segment lumbar interbody fusion.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05930-5. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 36471300 Free PMC article.
-
Can radial bone mineral density predict spinal bone mineral density in patients with advanced Duchenne muscular dystrophy?Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(40):e12303. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012303. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30290594 Free PMC article.
-
The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review of accuracy.Osteoporos Int. 2009 Apr;20(4):599-607. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0713-0. Epub 2008 Aug 21. Osteoporos Int. 2009. PMID: 18716823
-
Utility and validation of bone mineral density measurements at forearm in predicting trabecular microarchitecture and central-site osteoporosis in aging Indian postmenopausal women-a promising surrogate?Aging Med (Milton). 2022 Jan 23;5(1):30-37. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12191. eCollection 2022 Mar. Aging Med (Milton). 2022. PMID: 35309158 Free PMC article.
-
Forearm bone mineral density predicts subsidence of titanium mesh cage after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in patients with cervical spondylosis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 30;20(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05843-8. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40307823 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical