Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 May;53(5):372-7.

Survival of vascular access during daily and three times a week hemodialysis

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11305810
Comparative Study

Survival of vascular access during daily and three times a week hemodialysis

G Quintaliani et al. Clin Nephrol. 2000 May.

Abstract

Aim: A major cause of morbidity for hemodialysis patients is vascular access failure and/or occlusion. It is commonly believed that an increased frequency of dialysis sessions, among other factors, might lead to a higher rate of fistula complications.

Materials and methods: To evaluate if patients on daily hemodialysis carry a higher risk of vascular access occlusion, we examined the incidence rate of access occlusion and the survival function of native vascular accesses in patients undergoing daily dialysis (DD; n = 24) as compared to patients on standard three times a week hemodialysis (TWD; n = 124).

Results: The mean follow-up time was 3.6 years. In the TWD group 42 patients had a first-access closure, whereas only 2 patients out 24 had a similar event in the DD group. The proportion of first-access closure was 33.9% for TWD and 8.3% for DD (p < 0.01). The incidence rate was 9.8 (95% CI: 7.2 -13.2) and 2.2 (95% CI: 0.4 - 7.1) events per 100 patient-years for TWD and DD, respectively. The rate difference was 7.6 (95% CI 3.4 - 11.9) events per 100 patient-years, and the unadjusted risk ratio was 4.5 (95% CI: 1.2 - 16.9; p < 0.01). The mean vascular access survival before closure was 3.3 years in TWD and 3.7 years in DD. Survival curves, obtained considering the first-access closure as the endpoint, showed a significant difference between DD and TWD (log-rank 5.16; p < 0.05). In a Cox-proportional hazard model the relative risk (RR) of vascular-access closure in TWD remained significant (RR = 4.3; 95% CI 1.1 - 18.2) after adjustment for age.

Conclusion: The results of this observational study, conducted on a limited number of DD patients, suggest that daily dialysis might not have an adverse prognostic significance for access closure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Nocturnal hemodialysis.
    Ranganathan D, John GT. Ranganathan D, et al. Indian J Nephrol. 2012 Sep;22(5):323-32. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.103905. Indian J Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 23326041 Free PMC article.
  • Risk of vascular access complications with frequent hemodialysis.
    Suri RS, Larive B, Sherer S, Eggers P, Gassman J, James SH, Lindsay RM, Lockridge RS, Ornt DB, Rocco MV, Ting GO, Kliger AS; Frequent Hemodialysis Network Trial Group. Suri RS, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Feb;24(3):498-505. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012060595. Epub 2013 Feb 7. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013. PMID: 23393319 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
  • Home versus in-centre haemodialysis for people with kidney failure.
    Cheetham MS, Ethier I, Krishnasamy R, Cho Y, Palmer SC, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Stroumza P, Frantzen L, Hegbrant J, Strippoli GF. Cheetham MS, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 8;4(4):CD009535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009535.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38588450 Free PMC article.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources