Reliability of bimaxillary surgical planning with the 3-D orthognathic surgery simulator
- PMID: 11307223
Reliability of bimaxillary surgical planning with the 3-D orthognathic surgery simulator
Abstract
Functional and esthetic dysgnathia surgery requires accurate planning and precise surgical technique. Programs that simulate such surgery have thus become increasingly important. These are useless, however, when there is no technique for reproduction of surgical planning in the patient. This can be mediated by a surgical model. The present study investigates the accuracy resulting from use of the 3-D orthognathic surgery simulator (3-D OSS) in reproducing planned patient treatment. Eighteen patients with Angle Class III malocclusions who required bimaxillary surgery were evaluated. Planning criteria depended on the orthognathically intended occlusion and the jaw position simulated in the dentofacial planner, which predicted a harmonious profile. Model planning was carried out in the 3-D OSS. The accuracy of surgical reproduction was determined by cephalometric comparison of the postoperative cephalograms and computer simulation images. There were horizontal repositioning errors of 0.61 +/- 0.45 mm to 0.78 +/- 0.52 mm at the maxillary reference points (posterior nasal spine, anterior nasal spine, point A, and incision superius). Analysis of the positioning precision attained vertically was of the same order of magnitude, with values between 0.57 +/- 0.46 mm and 0.85 +/- 0.71 mm. Less precision was achieved in the mandible. The mean horizontal variation observed at incision inferius (0.91 +/- 0.51 mm) was still within the range of values for the maxilla, but an increase in the error to 1.61 +/- 0.79 mm was registered caudally to menton. The attained position of the maxilla did not vary significantly from the planned position (P < or = 0.05). Use of the orthognathic surgery simulator allowed precise implementation of the planned surgery. The model planning proved to be very helpful in preparing difficult bimaxillary operations.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009 Jul;37(5):279-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Feb 1. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19188076
-
Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.027. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20362896
-
Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Feb;105(2):e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.040. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008. PMID: 18230371
-
Three-dimensional computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.Clin Plast Surg. 2007 Jul;34(3):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2007.04.006. Clin Plast Surg. 2007. PMID: 17692702 Review.
-
[Decision strategy in orthognathic surgery. Part 2: The esthetic choice in orthognathic surgery--practical applications].Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1992;93(5):287-97. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1992. PMID: 1411227 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Ridge augmentation-The new field of computerized guided surgery: A technical note for minimal-invasive bone splitting.Clin Case Rep. 2021 Mar 20;9(4):2390-2396. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.4046. eCollection 2021 Apr. Clin Case Rep. 2021. PMID: 33936701 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Predictability Error in Orthognathic Surgery.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019 Sep;18(3):474-478. doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-01181-x. Epub 2019 Jan 18. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019. PMID: 31371893 Free PMC article.