Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1975 May;111(5):605-10.
doi: 10.1164/arrd.1975.111.5.605.

Predictability of the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) in ragweed pollenosis

Predictability of the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) in ragweed pollenosis

M G Perera et al. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975 May.

Abstract

The radioallergosorbent test was compared with currently accepted allergy diagnostic techniques in ragweed-sensitive and unselected patients. The radioallergosorbent test was positive in 28 of 30 patients with proved histories, positive scratch tests, and positive nasal provation tests to ragweed. The radioallergosorbent test was also positive in 69 per cent of 40 clinically sensitive patients whose diagnoses were corroborated by scratch tests alone. In unselected patients evaluated by intracutaneous testing with short ragweed extract, 10 minus 3 g per ml, the incidence of positive radioallergosorbent test scores was reduced to 43 per cent. No false positive results were encountered in these studies. A good relationship was observed between radioallergosorbent test scores and the maximal tolerable dose of ragweed administered during a course of "rush" immunotherapy in clinically allergic patients. These results suggest that the radioallergosorbent test has several unique advantages in assessing clinical sensitivity to ragweed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.
    Wise SK, Lin SY, Toskala E, Orlandi RR, Akdis CA, Alt JA, Azar A, Baroody FM, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Chacko T, Cingi C, Ciprandi G, Corey J, Cox LS, Creticos PS, Custovic A, Damask C, DeConde A, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, Eloy JA, Flanagan CE, Fokkens WJ, Franzese C, Gosepath J, Halderman A, Hamilton RG, Hoffman HJ, Hohlfeld JM, Houser SM, Hwang PH, Incorvaia C, Jarvis D, Khalid AN, Kilpeläinen M, Kingdom TT, Krouse H, Larenas-Linnemann D, Laury AM, Lee SE, Levy JM, Luong AU, Marple BF, McCoul ED, McMains KC, Melén E, Mims JW, Moscato G, Mullol J, Nelson HS, Patadia M, Pawankar R, Pfaar O, Platt MP, Reisacher W, Rondón C, Rudmik L, Ryan M, Sastre J, Schlosser RJ, Settipane RA, Sharma HP, Sheikh A, Smith TL, Tantilipikorn P, Tversky JR, Veling MC, Wang Y, Westman M, Wickman M, Zacharek M. Wise SK, et al. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Feb;8(2):108-352. doi: 10.1002/alr.22073. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018. PMID: 29438602 Free PMC article.
  • Chymopapain induced allergic reactions.
    Bernstein DI, Bernstein IL. Bernstein DI, et al. Clin Rev Allergy. 1986 May;4(2):201-13. doi: 10.1007/BF02991109. Clin Rev Allergy. 1986. PMID: 3516360 Review. No abstract available.
  • In vitro allergy testing. Past, present, and future.
    Perelmutter LL. Perelmutter LL. Clin Rev Allergy. 1994 Summer;12(2):151-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02802352. Clin Rev Allergy. 1994. PMID: 7954187 Review. No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources