Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 May;85(5):586-91.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.5.586.

Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes with visual field and scanning laser polarimetry measurements

Affiliations

Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes with visual field and scanning laser polarimetry measurements

R Lauande-Pimentel et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 May.

Erratum in

  • Br J Ophthalmol 2002 Jun;86(6):707

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the ability of structural parameters (as determined by retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) measurements obtained with the scanning laser polarimeter (SLP-NFA/GDx)) and functional parameters (as determined by automated perimetry) to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Methods: In a case-control study, a total of 91 normal subjects and 94 patients with glaucoma underwent automated perimetry and RNFL measurements obtained with the SLP. Three independent scans of each eye were obtained and a mean image was created and used for further analysis. Only one eye per individual was randomly included in the study. The sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of 12 RNFL parameters were calculated according to the SLP internal normative database. The Se and Sp of the visual field (VF) global indices and the glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) were also calculated according to the instrument's normative database. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were built for each SLP parameter and VF index. Fisher's linear discriminant formulas (LDFs) were developed for VF indices (VF LDF), SLP measurements (SLP LDF), and both examinations (combined LDF).

Results: According to the SLP internal database, the parameters with better Se and Sp were: superior/nasal ratio (Se = 58.5%; Sp = 86.8%), and GDx the number (Se = 43.3%; Sp = 96.7%). The construction of an ROC curve for the number resulted in Se = 84% and Sp = 79%. The creation of LDFs improved both the sensitivities and specificities when compared with isolated parameters SLP LDF (Se = 90.4%; Sp = 82.4%), VF LDF (Se = 89.4%; Sp = 89.0%), and combined LDF (Se = 93.0%; Sp = 90.1%). The sensitivity to diagnose early and moderate glaucomatous damage observed with the GHT was lower than that obtained with the number (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Creation of LDFs enhanced the Se and Sp for both VF and SLP. Integration of SLP and VF in a combined LDF reached the highest Se/Sp relation, suggesting that these examinations may be additive concerning the diagnosis of glaucoma. The SLP parameter the number may be more sensitive than the GHT in diagnosing early and moderate glaucomatous damage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of some SLP parameters ((A) symmetry, (B) the number, (C) superior/nasal ratio) among normal and glaucomatous groups, showing an important overlap of measurements. (Bars represent means and SD.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Symmetry, (B) the number, and (C) superior/nasal ratio receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.

References

    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Mar;100(3):438-42 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Jun;111(6):831-6 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1986 Feb;135(2):272-4 - PubMed
    1. Indian Pediatr. 1986 May;23(5):363-9 - PubMed
    1. Can J Ophthalmol. 1986 Dec;21(7):276-83 - PubMed

Publication types