Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Mar;16(3):143-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00537.x.

Improving depression outcomes in community primary care practice: a randomized trial of the quEST intervention. Quality Enhancement by Strategic Teaming

K Rost  1 , P Nutting, J Smith, J Werner, N Duan
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Improving depression outcomes in community primary care practice: a randomized trial of the quEST intervention. Quality Enhancement by Strategic Teaming

K Rost et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether redefining primary care team roles would improve outcomes for patients beginning a new treatment episode for major depression.

Design: Following stratification, 6 of 12 practices were randomly assigned to the intervention condition. Intervention effectiveness was evaluated by patient reports of 6-month change in 100-point depression symptom and functional status scales.

Setting: Twelve community primary care practices across the country employing no onsite mental health professional.

Patients: Using two-stage screening, practices enrolled 479 depressed adult patients (73.4% of those eligible); 90.2% completed six-month follow-up.

Intervention: Two primary care physicians, one nurse, and one administrative staff member in each intervention practice received brief training to improve the detection and management of major depression.

Main results: In patients beginning a new treatment episode, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 8.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 16.1; P =.04). Within this group, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 16.2 points (95% CI, 4.5 to 27.9; P =.007), physical role functioning by 14.1 points (95% CI, 1.1 to 29.2; P =.07), and satisfaction with care (P =.02) for patients who reported antidepressant medication was an acceptable treatment at baseline. Patients already in treatment at enrollment did not benefit from the intervention.

Conclusions: In practices without onsite mental health professionals, brief interventions training primary care teams to assume redefined roles can significantly improve depression outcomes in patients beginning a new treatment episode. Such interventions should target patients who report that antidepressant medication is an acceptable treatment for their condition. More research is needed to determine how primary care teams can best sustain these redefined roles over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Profile of randomized controlled trial.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Intervention effects on pharmacotherapy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rost KM, Zhang M, Fortney J, Smith J, Coyne J, Smith Gr., Jr Persistently poor outcomes of undetected major depression in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1998;20:12–20. - PubMed
    1. Schulberg HC, McClelland M, Gooding W. Six-month outcomes for medical patients with major depressive disorders. J Gen Intern Med. 1987;2:312–7. - PubMed
    1. Schulberg HC, Block MR, Madonia MJ, et al. The ‘usual care’ of major depression in primary care practice. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:334–9. - PubMed
    1. Simon GE, Von Korff M. Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:99–105. - PubMed
    1. Lin EHB, Katon WJ, Von Korff M, et al. Relapse of depression in primary care: rate and clinical predictors. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:443–9. - PubMed

Publication types