Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Apr;16(4):250-6.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004250.x.

The future of capitation: the physician role in managing change in practice

Affiliations

The future of capitation: the physician role in managing change in practice

J D Goodson et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Apr.

Abstract

Capitation-based reimbursement significantly influences the practice of medicine. As physicians, we need to assure that payment models do not jeopardize the care we provide when we accept higher levels of personal financial risk. In this paper, we review the literature relevant to capitation, consider the interaction of financial incentives with physician and medical risk, and conclude that primary care physicians need to work to assure that capitated systems incorporate checks and balances which protect both patients and providers. We offer the following proposals for individuals and groups considering capitated contracts: (1) reimbursement for primary care physicians should recognize both individual patient encounters and the administrative work of patient care management; (2) reimbursement for subspecialists should recognize both access to subspecialty knowledge and expertise as well as patient care encounters, but in some situations, subspecialists may provide the majority of care to individual patients and will be reimbursed as primary care providers; (3) groups of physicians should accept financial risk for patient care only if they have the tools and resources to manage the care; (4) physicians sharing risk for patient care should meet regularly to discuss care and resource management; and (5) physicians must disclose the financial relationships they have with health plans and medical care organizations, and engage patients and communities in discussions about resource allocation. As a payment model, capitation offers opportunities for primary care physicians to influence the future of health care by improving the management of resources at a local level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Simplified capitation reimbursement models, excluding hospital and institutional costs, pharmacy costs, medical device costs, facility costs, and home care costs. Consultation access costs are capitated payments to subspecialists/consultants to be available for informal consultation (electronic) and comanagement discussions with primary care physicians. Discretionary funds are the portion of capitated payment set aside for care innovation beyond covered services or procedures. Encounter-based care is care reimbursement based on relative value units (RVUs) of care. Meeting participation is defined as payments made to physicians for participation in care management meetings. Panel size is the number of patient-months of care. Reserves are funds that are held back to cover payment delays, seasonal variations in operational expenses, etc. Risk protection insurance is coverage for unexpected costs associated with patient care or visit volume and is also known as “stop-loss” reinsurance.

References

    1. Blumenthal D. Health care reform — past and future. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:465–8. - PubMed
    1. Relman AS. The Health Care Industry: Where is it taking us? N Engl J Med. 1991;325:854–8. - PubMed
    1. Epstein AM, Begg CB, McNeil BJ. The use of ambulatory testing in prepaid and fee-for-service group practices. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1089–94. - PubMed
    1. Murray JP, Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Yano EM. Ambulatory testing for capitation and fee-for-service patients in the same practice setting: Relationship to outcomes. Med Care. 1992;30:252–61. - PubMed
    1. Clement DG, Retchin SM, Brown RS, et al. Access and outcomes of elderly patients enrolled in managed care. JAMA. 1994;271:1487–92. - PubMed