Grade III open tibial fractures: functional outcome and quality of life in amputees versus patients with successful reconstruction

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term functional outcome and the quality of life of patients who were treated for a (Gustilo) Grade III open tibial fracture. We included 43 patients with successful limb salvage (group A) and 21 amputees (group B). The groups were similar with regard to age, sex, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). The functional outcome was scored using the "Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment". To compare quality of life we used the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the SF-36, and a questionnaire especially designed for this study. The mean lower extremity impairment (AMA) of patients in group A was 17.6%, compared to 73.5% for patients in group B. The results with both NHP and SF-36 show that patients in both groups have more problems in most categories than a healthy reference group. With the NHP, the difference in score was largest for the categories of pain, mobility, energy and sleep. The SF-36 scores correlated well with the NHP scores. No significant difference was found between the two groups. This type of injury has an enormous impact on every aspect of life--irrespective of the chosen treatment. A significant difference in lower extremity impairment is found between patients with a successful reconstruction and those who are amputees. However, the quality of life was shown to be the same.