Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 May;8(3):496-8.
doi: 10.1128/CDLI.8.3.496-498.2001.

Evaluation of a latex agglutination kit (Virogen Rotatest) for detection of bovine rotavirus in fecal samples

Affiliations

Evaluation of a latex agglutination kit (Virogen Rotatest) for detection of bovine rotavirus in fecal samples

Y Al-Yousif et al. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001 May.

Abstract

The performance of the Virogen Rotatest latex agglutination test (LAT) was evaluated for detection of bovine rotavirus antigen. Sixty-three fecal samples from diarrheic calves were collected from November 1999 to May 2000 and screened by LAT, the Rotazyme II enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and virus isolation (VI) followed by an anti-rotavirus fluorescent-antibody (FA) test to detect the presence of group A rotavirus antigen. Of the 63 samples screened by VI-FA, 33 (58%) tested positive for rotavirus antigen. When the results from the LAT were compared to those from VI-FA, the "gold standard" for detection of bovine rotavirus in fecal samples, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 87.8 and 73.3%, respectively. Latex agglutination compared with ELISA (the reference method) showed 100% sensitivity and 96.3% specificity, and when ELISA was compared with VI, the sensitivity was 84.8% and the specificity was 73.3%. Latex agglutination is easy to perform in a short time and does not require expensive equipment or skilled personnel, and the reagents have long shelf lives. These factors make the LAT suitable and highly efficient for use in a clinical laboratory as a rapid screening test for bovine rotavirus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Al-Yousif Y, Al-Majhdi F, Chard-Bergstrom C, Anderson J, Kapil S. Development, characterization, and diagnostic applications of monoclonal antibodies against bovine rotavirus. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:288–292. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Athanassious R, Marsolias G, Assaf R, Dea S, Descoteaux J, Dulude R, Montpetit C. Detection of bovine coronavirus and type A rotavirus in neonatal calf diarrhea and winter dysentery of cattle in Quebec: evaluation of three diagnostic methods. Can Vet J. 1994;35:163–169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benfield D A, Stotz I J, Nelson E A, Groon K S. Comparison of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with electron microscopy, fluorescent antibody, and virus isolation for the detection of bovine and porcine rotavirus. Am J Vet Res. 1984;45:1998–2002. - PubMed
    1. Chen D, Ramig R F. Determinants of rotavirus stability and density during CsCl purification. Virology. 1992;186:228–237. - PubMed
    1. Czeruy C P, Eichhorn W. Characterization of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies to bovine enteric coronavirus: establishment of an efficient ELISA for antigen detection in feces. Vet Microbiol. 1989;20:111–122. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types