The comparative pharmacology of angiotensin II receptor antagonists
- PMID: 11333013
The comparative pharmacology of angiotensin II receptor antagonists
Abstract
Several orally active non-peptide angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists are now available for the treatment of hypertension. These agents have a common mechanism of action--blockade of the binding of angiotensin II to the subtype 1 receptor--and their binding to this receptor is generally insurmountable. There are some pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between these antagonists, which may reflect in their clinical efficacy, especially at the end of the dosing interval. Losartan has an active metabolite that prolongs its duration of action, and candesartan cilexetil requires conversion to an active form after administration. Telmisartan has the longest duration of action, with a terminal elimination half-life of around 24 h in comparison with 11-15 h for irbesartan, the agent with the next longest half-life. The long duration of action and insurmountable binding to the receptor may be related to the slow dissociation kinetics of the antagonists from the AT1 receptor. Comparative clinical studies suggest that at the recommended dose losartan, the original drug in this class, has a lower antihypertensive efficacy than the newer agents, such as telmisartan. It is possible that these differences between angiotensin II receptor antagonists are due to variations in the degree and duration of receptor blockade, and may be of clinical significance with regard to the cardioprotective and renoprotective effects of this class of antihypertensive agents.
Similar articles
-
Pharmacological properties of angiotensin II receptor antagonists.Can J Cardiol. 1999 Nov;15 Suppl F:26F-8F. Can J Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 10579749 Review.
-
Sympatho-inhibitory properties of various AT1 receptor antagonists.J Hypertens Suppl. 2002 Jun;20(5):S3-11. J Hypertens Suppl. 2002. PMID: 12184061
-
Comparative in vivo effects of irbesartan and losartan on angiotensin II receptor binding in the rat kidney following oral administration.Clin Sci (Lond). 2000 Oct;99(4):331-41. Clin Sci (Lond). 2000. PMID: 10995600
-
Comparative antihypertensive effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonists.J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Apr;10 Suppl 12:S278-82. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999. PMID: 10201883 Review.
-
AT(1)-receptor blockers: differences that matter.J Hum Hypertens. 2002 Aug;16 Suppl 3:S9-S16. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001434. J Hum Hypertens. 2002. PMID: 12140723 Review.
Cited by
-
Telmisartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.Drugs. 2006;66(1):51-83. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666010-00004. Drugs. 2006. PMID: 16398568 Review.
-
To compare the effect of Telmisartan with Metoprolol on arterial stiffness in hypertension: prospective randomized parallel group trial.Indian Heart J. 2014 Jul-Aug;66(4):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 14. Indian Heart J. 2014. PMID: 25173199 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Prospective, Randomized Open-Label Study for Assessment of Antihypertensive Effect of Telmisartan Versus Cilnidipine Using Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (START ABPM Study).Cardiol Res. 2023 Jun;14(3):211-220. doi: 10.14740/cr1476. Epub 2023 May 26. Cardiol Res. 2023. PMID: 37304922 Free PMC article.
-
Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the SMOOTH study.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2007 Oct 2;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-6-28. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2007. PMID: 17910747 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Telmisartan on Arsenic-Induced (Sub-chronic) Perturbations in Redox Homeostasis, Pro-inflammatory Cascade and Aortic Dysfunction in Wistar Rats.Biol Trace Elem Res. 2022 Apr;200(4):1776-1790. doi: 10.1007/s12011-021-02804-0. Epub 2021 Jul 30. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2022. PMID: 34339004
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials