[Peer review in scientific journals]
- PMID: 11334583
- PMCID: PMC7676625
- DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78827-0
[Peer review in scientific journals]
Comment in
-
[Utopian or naive?].Aten Primaria. 2001 Oct 15;28(6):441. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)70411-8. Aten Primaria. 2001. PMID: 11602129 Free PMC article. Spanish. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Conceptual debates and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals.J Prof Nurs. 2011 May-Jun;27(3):168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.09.015. J Prof Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21596357 Review.
-
Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.Nature. 2002 Oct 24;419(6909):772-6. doi: 10.1038/419772a. Nature. 2002. PMID: 12397323 No abstract available.
-
Peer review of manuscripts.J Clin Neurosci. 2002 Mar;9(2):105-8. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2001.0960. J Clin Neurosci. 2002. PMID: 11922694
-
Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.Nature. 2006 Jan 19;439(7074):252. doi: 10.1038/439252b. Nature. 2006. PMID: 16421533 No abstract available.
-
Peer review.Bone Joint J. 2014 Apr;96-B(4):436-41. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33041. Bone Joint J. 2014. PMID: 24692607 Review.
Cited by
-
[Utopian or naive?].Aten Primaria. 2001 Oct 15;28(6):441. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)70411-8. Aten Primaria. 2001. PMID: 11602129 Free PMC article. Spanish. No abstract available.
References
-
- Rodríguez Artalejo F. Ocultar la identidad de los autores y evaluadores de artículos. Gac Sanit. 1996;10:159–160. - PubMed
-
- Burnham J.C. The evolution of editorial per review. JAMA. 1990;263:1323–1329. - PubMed
-
- Relman A.S. The NIH «E-Biomed» proposal. A potential threat to the evaluation and orderly dissemination of new clinical studies. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1828–1829. - PubMed
-
- Ingelfinger F.J. Peer review in biomedical publication. Am J Med. 1974;56:686–692. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources