Reconstructive management of cranial base defects after tumor ablation
- PMID: 11335798
- DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200105000-00003
Reconstructive management of cranial base defects after tumor ablation
Abstract
Successful reconstruction after cranial base tumor ablation is paramount in preventing potentially life-threatening complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate experiences of cranial base reconstruction and to identify reconstructive management principles that may assist in achieving successful cranial base reconstruction. All cranial base reconstructions performed by the Department of Plastic Surgery at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between January of 1993 and September of 1999 were reviewed. Analyses were performed to assess the impact of location of defect, type of reconstruction, type of dural repair, and history of preoperative radiation and chemotherapy on rates of complications, and patient survival. The 77 patients who underwent cranial base reconstruction after tumor ablation during the study period had a mean age of 52 years (6 to 84 years). The mean follow-up period was 28.7 months (1 to 76 months). Squamous cell carcinoma, the most common histopathologic type, was present in 24 patients (31 percent), and 35 patients (45 percent) presented with recurrent disease. Location of defects involved region I (anterior) in 31 patients (40 percent), region II (anterior-lateral) in 18 (23 percent), region III (lateral-posterior) in six (8 percent), and more than one region in 22 (29 percent). Reconstructive methods included free flaps in 52 patients (68 percent), temporalis muscle flaps in 14 (18 percent), pericranial flaps in eight (10 percent), and other local flaps (two galeal, one scalp) in three (4 percent). Of the 52 free flaps, 18 (35 percent) were used in region I, 14 (27 percent) in region II, six (12 percent) in region III, and 14 (27 percent) in defects involving more than one region. Of the 14 temporalis muscle flaps, 13 (93 percent) were used for defects involving regions I or II and one (7 percent) was used for a defect involving region III. Of the 11 pericranial and other local flaps, nine (82 percent) were used in region I, one (9 percent) in region II, and one (9 percent) in a combination of regions II and III. Complications occurred in 21 patients (27 percent): three total flap losses (4 percent), three partial flap losses (4 percent), two cerebrospinal fluid leaks (3 percent), two cases of meningitis (3 percent), two abscesses (3 percent), five cases of delayed wound healing (6 percent), two hematomas (3 percent), one wound infection (1 percent), and one cerebrovascular accident (1 percent). Overall survival was 77 percent at 2 years and 58 percent at 4 years. The type of reconstruction, location of defect, type of dural repair, and history of preoperative radiation and chemotherapy had no significant association with the incidence of complications. Neither the type of reconstruction nor the location of defect showed a significant effect on patient survival. In this experience, local flaps, such as pericranial or temporalis muscle flaps, are good choices for reconstruction of smaller anterior or lateral cranial base defects. For defects that require larger amounts of soft tissue, free flaps are appropriate. With proper patient selection, successful cranial base reconstruction can be performed with either local or free flaps with a low incidence of complications.
Similar articles
-
Use of microvascular free flaps in the reconstruction of the anterior and middle skull base.J Craniofac Surg. 2006 Jul;17(4):790-6. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200607000-00035. J Craniofac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16877936
-
Efficacy of simultaneous pericranial and nasoseptal "double flap" reconstruction of anterior skull base defects after combined transbasal and endoscopic endonasal approaches.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Mar;162(3):641-647. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04155-1. Epub 2019 Dec 7. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020. PMID: 31811470
-
Anterior and middle cranial fossa skull base reconstruction using microvascular free tissue techniques: surgical complications and functional outcomes.Ann Plast Surg. 2008 May;60(5):514-20. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181715707. Ann Plast Surg. 2008. PMID: 18434825
-
Reconstruction of the skull base after tumor resection: an overview of methods.Neurosurg Focus. 2002 May 15;12(5):e9. doi: 10.3171/foc.2002.12.5.10. Neurosurg Focus. 2002. PMID: 16119907 Review.
-
Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: a review and clinical case series of 152 vascularized flaps used for surgical skull base defects in the setting of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(4):E4. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.FOCUS14350. Neurosurg Focus. 2014. PMID: 25270144 Review.
Cited by
-
Free flap transfer in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a review of the current data.Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Sep;12(3):113-24. doi: 10.1007/s10006-008-0112-x. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18575905 Review.
-
Reconstruction of osteomyelitis defects of the craniofacial skeleton.Semin Plast Surg. 2009 May;23(2):119-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214164. Semin Plast Surg. 2009. PMID: 20567734 Free PMC article.
-
Autologous Free Fascia Lata Can Be Used as Dura Graft in the Salvage Treatment of Recalcitrant Postcraniotomy Intracranial Infection Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Sep 27;15:5667-5677. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S381087. eCollection 2022. Infect Drug Resist. 2022. PMID: 36193296 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior skull base surgery.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr;1(2):133-45. doi: 10.1007/s13193-010-0027-5. Epub 2010 Nov 21. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010. PMID: 22930628 Free PMC article.
-
Scalp reconstruction using the reverse temporalis muscle flap: a case report.Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022 Jun;23(3):134-138. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2022.00199. Epub 2022 Jun 20. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022. PMID: 35811346 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical