Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Apr;89(2):177-84.

Information needs of clinical teams: analysis of questions received by the Clinical Informatics Consult Service

R N Jerome  1 , N B Giuse, K W Gish, N A Sathe, M S Dietrich
Affiliations

Information needs of clinical teams: analysis of questions received by the Clinical Informatics Consult Service

R N Jerome et al. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the types of questions received by Clinical Informatics Consult Service (CICS) librarians from clinicians on rounds and to analyze the number of clearly differentiated viewpoints provided in response.

Design: Questions were retrieved from an internal database, the CICS Knowledge Base, and analyzed for redundancy by subject analysis. The unique questions were classified into ten categories by subject. Treatment-related questions were analyzed for the number of viewpoints represented in the librarian's response.

Results: The CICS Knowledge Base contained 476 unique questions and 71 redundant questions. Among the unique queries, the top two categories accounted for 67%: treatment (36%) and disease description (31%). Within the treatment-related subset, 138 questions (59%) required representation of more than one viewpoint in the librarian's response.

Discussion: Questions generated by clinicians frequently require comprehensive, critical appraisal of the medical literature, a need that can be filled by librarians trained in such techniques. This study demonstrates that many questions require representation of more than one viewpoint to answer completely. Moreover, the redundancy rate underscores the need for resources like the CICS Knowledge Base. By critically analyzing the medical literature, CICS librarians are providing a time-saving and valuable service for clinicians and charting new territory for librarians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Patrick SC. Critical appraisal of the medical literature: selected readings. Med Ref Serv Q. 1994 Fall; 13(3):37–7.
    1. Williamson JW, German PS, Weiss R, Skinner EA, and Bowes F. Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 15; 110(2):151–60. - PubMed
    1. Hunt RE, Newman RG. Medical knowledge overload: a disturbing trend for physicians. Health Care Manage Rev. 1997 Winter; 22(1):70–5. - PubMed
    1. MEDLINE fact sheet. . [Web Document]. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine. [4 May 2000; cited 27 Jun 2000]. <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/medline.html>.
    1. Zipser J. MEDLINE to PubMed and beyond. [Web Document]. Presented at the Health Sciences Library Association of New Jersey and New York-New Jersey Chapter of MLA Joint Meeting, Princeton, NJ, December 8, 1999. [10 Aug 1999; cited 27 Jun 2000]. <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/historypresentation.html>.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources