Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images
- PMID: 11341713
- DOI: 10.1109/42.918474
Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images
Abstract
A contrast detail analysis was performed to compare perception of low-contrast details on X-ray images derived from digital storage phosphor radiography and from a flat panel detector system based on a cesium iodide/amorphous silicon matrix. The CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to perform a comparative contrast detail analysis of a clinical storage phosphor radiography system and an indirect type digital flat panel detector unit. Images were acquired at exposure levels comparable to film speeds of 50/100/200/400 and 800. Four observers evaluated a total of 50 films with respect to the threshold contrast for each detail size. The numbers of correctly identified objects were determined for all image subsets. The overall results show that low-contrast detail perception with digital flat panel detector images is better than with state of the art storage phosphor screens. This is especially true for the low-exposure setting, where a nearly 10% higher correct observation ratio is reached. Given its high detective quantum efficiency the digital flat panel technology based on the cesium iodide scintillator/amorphous silicon matrix is best suited for detection of low-contrast detail structures, which shows its high potential for clinical imaging.
Similar articles
-
Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.Invest Radiol. 2003 Apr;38(4):212-20. doi: 10.1097/01.RLI.0000057032.41715.15. Invest Radiol. 2003. PMID: 12649645
-
Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.Radiology. 2001 Mar;218(3):679-82. doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr27679. Radiology. 2001. PMID: 11230639
-
Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Oct;181(4):923-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.4.1810923. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003. PMID: 14500203
-
The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.Clin Radiol. 2008 Oct;63(10):1073-85. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.06.002. Clin Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18774353 Review.
-
Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.Acta Radiol Suppl. 2002 Mar;43(427):1-43. Acta Radiol Suppl. 2002. PMID: 12108231 Review.
Cited by
-
Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems.IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Mar;29(3):790-806. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2036995. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010. PMID: 20199915 Free PMC article.
-
Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.Eur Radiol. 2006 Jul;16(7):1544-50. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0077-1. Epub 2006 Jan 11. Eur Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16404566 Clinical Trial.
-
Image quality and radiation dose in planar imaging - Image quality figure of merits from the CDRAD phantom.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jul;20(7):151-159. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12649. Epub 2019 Jun 1. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 31152576 Free PMC article.
-
Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.Eur Radiol. 2008 Sep;18(9):1818-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0948-3. Epub 2008 Apr 23. Eur Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18431577 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources