Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 11343480
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2331
Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Context: Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a lifelong problem that can be complicated by peptic esophageal stricture and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
Objective: To determine the long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for GERD.
Design and setting: Follow-up study conducted from October 1997 through October 1999 of a prospective randomized trial of medical and surgical antireflux treatments in patients with complicated GERD. Mean (median) duration of follow-up was 10.6 years (7.3 years) for medical patients and 9.1 years (6.3 years) for surgical patients.
Participants: Two hundred thirty-nine (97%) of the original 247 study patients were found (79 were confirmed dead). Among the 160 survivors (157 men and 3 women; mean [SD] age, 67 [12] years), 129 (91 in the medical treatment group and 38 in the surgical treatment group) participated in the follow-up.
Main outcome measures: Use of antireflux medication, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Activity Index (GRACI) scores, grade of esophagitis, frequency of treatment of esophageal stricture, frequency of subsequent antireflux operations, 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36) scores, satisfaction with antireflux therapy, survival, and incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, compared between the medical antireflux therapy group and the fundoplication surgery group. Information on cause of death was obtained from autopsy results, hospital records, and death certificates.
Results: Eighty-three (92%) of 90 medical patients and 23 (62%) of 37 surgical patients reported that they used antireflux medications regularly (P<.001). During a 1-week period after discontinuation of medication, mean (SD) GRACI symptom scores were significantly lower in the surgical treatment group (82.6 [17.5] vs 96.7 [21.4] in the medical treatment group; P =.003). However, no significant differences between the groups were found in grade of esophagitis, frequency of treatment of esophageal stricture and subsequent antireflux operations, SF-36 standardized physical and mental component scale scores, and overall satisfaction with antireflux therapy. Survival during a period of 140 months was decreased significantly in the surgical vs the medical treatment group (relative risk of death in the medical group, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.46; P =.047), largely because of excess deaths from heart disease. Patients with Barrett esophagus at baseline developed esophageal adenocarcinomas at an annual rate of 0.4%, whereas these cancers developed in patients without Barrett esophagus at an annual rate of only 0.07%. There was no significant difference between groups in incidence of esophageal cancer.
Conclusion: This study suggests that antireflux surgery should not be advised with the expectation that patients with GERD will no longer need to take antisecretory medications or that the procedure will prevent esophageal cancer among those with GERD and Barrett esophagus.
Comment in
-
Surgical therapy for reflux disease.JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2376-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2376. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11343486 No abstract available.
-
Medical vs surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1709; author reply 1711-2. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11594887 No abstract available.
-
Medical vs surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1709; author reply 1711-2. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11594888 No abstract available.
-
Medical vs surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1709-10; author reply 1711-2. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11594889 No abstract available.
-
Medical vs surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1710-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1682. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11594890 No abstract available.
-
Surgery relieved symptoms but decreased survival more than medical treatment in gastroesophageal reflux disease.ACP J Club. 2002 Jan-Feb;136(1):17. ACP J Club. 2002. PMID: 11829558 No abstract available.
-
Reflux esophagitis.Curr Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;60(4):376-80. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7944(02)00748-1. Curr Surg. 2003. PMID: 15212053 No abstract available.
-
What is the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication?Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Oct;5(10):540-1. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep1227. Epub 2008 Aug 19. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008. PMID: 18711415 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Esophageal adenocarcinoma arising after antireflux surgery: a population-based analysis.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Dec;40(6):1450-4; discussion 1454. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.075. Epub 2011 May 4. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21546258
-
Gastroesophageal reflux disease.JAMA. 1996 Sep 25;276(12):983-8. JAMA. 1996. PMID: 8805734 Review.
-
[Comparison of surgical patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus].Magy Seb. 2014 Oct;67(5):287-96. doi: 10.1556/MaSeb.67.2014.5.1. Magy Seb. 2014. PMID: 25327403 Hungarian.
-
Lower esophageal sphincter injections for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Thorac Surg Clin. 2005 Aug;15(3):405-15. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2005.04.001. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005. PMID: 16104131 Review.
-
Asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux: long term results of a randomized trial of medical and surgical antireflux therapies.Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 May;98(5):987-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07503.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12809818 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Causes of dissatisfaction after laparoscopic fundoplication: the impact of new symptoms, recurrent symptoms, and the patient experience.Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1537-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2611-y. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23508812
-
Radiologic and endoscopic characteristics of laparoscopic antireflux wrap: correlation with outcome.Int Surg. 2012 Jul-Sep;97(3):189-97. doi: 10.9738/CC120.1. Int Surg. 2012. PMID: 23113845 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian consensus on medically acceptable wait times for digestive health care.Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;20(6):411-23. doi: 10.1155/2006/343686. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16779459 Free PMC article.
-
Mesh erosion after hiatal hernia repair: the tip of the iceberg?Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1243-1252. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02011-w. Epub 2019 Jul 23. Hernia. 2019. PMID: 31338721
-
[Conventional and minimally invasive surgical methods for gastroesophageal reflux].Chirurg. 2005 Apr;76(4):370-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-004-0954-1. Chirurg. 2005. PMID: 15502889 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical