Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 May;24(5):393-6.
doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240509.

Staged revascularization in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease

Affiliations

Staged revascularization in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease

N J Hayat et al. Clin Cardiol. 2001 May.

Abstract

Background: Critically ill patients undergoing bypass surgery experience a higher mortality and morbidity.

Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and value of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) as a bridge to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in high-risk patients with refractory unstable angina or cardiogenic shock.

Methods: We present 11 seriously unstable patients with severe multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing culprit vessel PTCA. Angioplasty was performed not as a definitive procedure but rather as a bridge to surgical revascularization. All the patients had sustained at least one myocardial infarction prior to catheterization, all had refractory unstable angina, eight patients had only a single patent coronary artery, and five patients were in cardiogenic shock.

Results: Following PTCA, all patients enjoyed a stable in-hospital period. One patient died 12 weeks after successful PTCA while awaiting second CABG. Seven patients subsequently underwent CABG and are doing well. The remaining three patients were also advised to undergo CABG, but elected to continue medical management.

Conclusions: Coronary angioplasty of the culprit vessel may play a role as a bridge to surgery in critically ill patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Parisi AF, Folland ED, Hartigan P, and Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators : A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single‐vessel coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 10–16 - PubMed
    1. Fishman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, for the Stent Restenosis Study Investigators : A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496–501 - PubMed
    1. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneu F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, for the Benestent Study Group : A comparison of balloon‐expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489–495 - PubMed
    1. Clarkson PBM, Halim M, Ray KK, Doshi S, Been M, Singh H, Shiu MF: Coronary artery stenting in unstable angina pectoris: A comparison with stable angina pectoris. Heart 1999; 81: 393–397 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez AE, Fernandez M, Santaera O, Larribau M, Bernardi V, Castano H, Palacios LF: Coronary stenting in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77 (9): 685–689 - PubMed