Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 May;127(5):497-503.
doi: 10.1001/archotol.127.5.497.

Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability

Affiliations

Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability

T Miwa et al. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether olfactory loss affects patients' quality of life or level of disability.

Design: Retrospective survey using questionnaire data and clinic database review.

Setting: Two university medical center smell and taste clinics.

Patients: A total of 1407 patients were tested for smell and taste disturbances from 1984 through 1998. Surveys were mailed to 1093 patients who had abnormal test scores; 420 (38.4%) returned completed surveys. Patients were grouped by self-rated ability to smell as "impaired" (those reporting persisting deficits) or "improved" (those reporting no smell problem when surveyed).

Main outcome measures: Response frequencies were compared between the 2 groups for questions regarding ability to perform common activities of daily living and quality-of-life issues.

Results: Mean (+/-SD) number of activities of daily living affected by olfactory loss was 4.70 +/- 3.56 for the impaired group and 0.61 +/- 1.58 for the improved group (P < .001). Among specific activities, the most common cited impairments were ability to detect spoiled food (impaired vs improved groups, 75% vs 12%; P < .001), gas leaks (61% vs 8%; P < .001), or smoke (50% vs 1%; P < .001); eating (53% vs 12%; P < .001); and cooking (49% vs 12%; P < .001). Differences in quality-of-life issues were reported primarily in the areas of safety and eating. Overall satisfaction with life was reported by 87% of the improved group but only 50% of the impaired group (P < .001).

Conclusions: Patients reporting persistent olfactory impairment after previously documented olfactory loss indicate a higher level of disability and lower quality of life than those with perceived resolution of olfactory compromise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types