Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors
- PMID: 11346743
- DOI: 10.1067/moe.2001.113590
Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of 6 intraoral direct digital sensors. The sensors were Visualix 1, Visualix 2, DenOptix, Computed Dental Radiography (CDR), CDR APS, and Digora.
Study design: The sensors were exposed by using a dental x-ray machine operating at 50 kV, 8 mA and various exposure times. The phantom used was a hole measuring 1 mm in diameter and 1.25 mm in depth, drilled in a 10-mm-thick aluminum block. Digital images were transferred as 8-bit tagged image file format files and analyzed by using a personal computer.
Results and conclusions: SNR values increased up to a maximum value at a certain exposure level and then, depending on the system, either decreased or maintained a high level with increased exposure. The Digora system produced the highest SNR values over a large exposure range, whereas the Visualix 2 and DenOptix systems produced the lowest SNR values. The 2 CDR sensors produced rather high SNRs but over a very small exposure range.
Similar articles
-
Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Sep;90(3):377-84. doi: 10.1067/moe.2000.107532. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000. PMID: 10982962
-
Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Mar;29(2):70-5. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600501. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000. PMID: 10808218
-
Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):313-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci762. Epub 2006 Feb 3. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005. PMID: 16461488
-
Digital imaging for dental caries.Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):319-38, vi. Dent Clin North Am. 2000. PMID: 10740771 Review.
-
Digital imaging modalities for dental practice.Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2001 Feb;42(1):1-14. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.42.1. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2001. PMID: 11484791 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of noise characteristics in intraoral X-ray sensors using the Noise-Power Spectrum and non-parametric metrics from diagnostic imaging.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2025 Sep 1;54(6):510-515. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twaf040. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40354618 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of alternative photostimulable phosphor plates erasing times on subjective digital image quality.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jan;39(1):23-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/49065239. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20089740 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images.Eur Oral Res. 2023 May 4;57(2):68-74. doi: 10.26650/eor.2023984422. Eur Oral Res. 2023. PMID: 37525855 Free PMC article.
-
Image resolution and exposure time of digital radiographs affects fractal dimension of periapical bone.Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Oct;16(5):1507-10. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0639-3. Epub 2011 Nov 29. Clin Oral Investig. 2012. PMID: 22124611
-
Variation in voxel value distribution and effect of time between exposures in six CBCT units.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(4):20130376. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130376. Epub 2014 Feb 3. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24678846 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous