Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Apr;55(3):177-82.

Improved glycaemic control with the use of self-prepared mixtures of insulin lispro and insulin lispro protamine suspension in patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11351771
Clinical Trial

Improved glycaemic control with the use of self-prepared mixtures of insulin lispro and insulin lispro protamine suspension in patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes

P Roach et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2001 Apr.

Abstract

A total of 166 patients (102 type 1, 64 type 2) were randomised to insulin lispro (LP) combined with insulin lispro protamine suspension (NPL), an intermediate-acting formulation of LP, or to regular human insulin (HR) combined with human NPH insulin (NPH) in this open-label, parallel study. Insulin doses were similar at endpoint. Blood glucose (BG) measurements (before and two hours after meals, bedtime, 3 a.m.)(mmol/l) were lower with LP/NPL two hours after breakfast (8.84 +/- 0.32 vs 10.29 +/- 0.41, p < 0.001), before lunch (6.21 +/- 0.20 vs 7.10 +/- 0.31, p = 0.016), two hours after the evening meal (10.18 +/- 0.36 vs 7.86 +/- 0.28, p < 0.0.001), and at bedtime (7.85 +/- 0.28 vs 9.43 +/- 0.40, p = 001). HbA1c was lower for LP/NPL at endpoint (7.54 +/- 0.11% vs 7.92 +/- 0.10%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in hypoglycaemia or insulin antibody levels. LP/NPL resulted in better glycaemic control than HR/NPH without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources