Assessment and management of intermittent claudication: importance of secondary prevention
- PMID: 11355275
Assessment and management of intermittent claudication: importance of secondary prevention
Abstract
Atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common disorder with a steep age-related incidence that affects 5-10% of the over 55-year age group. Because of the association with atherosclerotic disease elsewhere, particularly coronary heart disease (CHD), the ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) correlates inversely with survival. Clinical management centres around detection, assessment, symptom relief and prevention of secondary cardiovascular complications. Non-invasive ultrasound and colour duplex techniques have revolutionised the detection of PAD, and the long-term surveillance of disease progression, while antiplatelet therapy coupled with risk factor modification (lipids, blood pressure and glycaemic control and smoking cessation) are aimed at reducing direct or indirect vascular complications, e.g. amputation or CHD death. The natural history of intermittent claudication, although troublesome and disabling, often runs a stable, fairly benign course, so the majority of patients (73%) are treated medically. Selecting patients for surgical revascularisation (angioplasty, bypass or endarterectomy) is guided principally by the severity of clinical symptoms, but discrete, proximal, short-segmental lesions are the most amenable to surgical intervention. In general, surgery is indicated to relieve disabling symptoms when medical therapy had failed; for treatment of symptoms of limb-threatening ischaemia, including rest pain, ischaemic ulceration and gangrene; and to remove or bypass sources of thrombo-embolism. Thus, medical therapies for symptom relief and secondary prevention of complications form the mainstay of treatment for three-quarters of patients with uncomplicated intermittent claudication.
Similar articles
-
Management of intermittent claudication: the importance of secondary prevention.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002 Feb;23(2):100-7. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1544. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002. PMID: 11863326 Review.
-
Optimal medical management of peripheral arterial disease.Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2006 Aug-Sep;40(4):312-27. doi: 10.1177/1538574406291835. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2006. PMID: 16959725 Review.
-
Peripheral arterial disease: a review of disease awareness and management.Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Dec;4(4):365-79. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.12.006. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006. PMID: 17296541 Review.
-
Peripheral arterial disease in women.Maturitas. 2009 Dec 20;64(4):204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Oct 22. Maturitas. 2009. PMID: 19853389 Review.
-
Office management of peripheral arterial disease.Am J Med. 2010 Sep;123(9):790-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.03.017. Am J Med. 2010. PMID: 20800143
Cited by
-
Genomic and proteomic determinants of lower extremity revascularization failure: rationale and study design.J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45 Suppl A(Suppl A):A82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.011. J Vasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17544028 Free PMC article.
-
Severity of peripheral arterial disease is associated with aortic pressure augmentation and subendocardial viability ratio.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Dec;14(12):855-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00702.x. Epub 2012 Aug 27. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012. PMID: 23205752 Free PMC article.