Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects
- PMID: 11356505
- DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01795-1
Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects
Abstract
Neuronal latencies delay the registration of the visual signal from a moving object. By the time the visual input reaches brain structures that encode its position, the object has already moved on. Do we perceive the position of a moving object with a delay because of neuronal latencies? Or is there a brain mechanism that compensates for latencies such that we perceive the true position of a moving object in real time? This question has been intensely debated in the context of the flash-lag illusion: a moving object and an object flashed in alignment with it appear to occupy different positions. The moving object is seen ahead of the flash. Does this show that the visual system extrapolates the position of moving objects into the future to compensate for neuronal latencies? Alternative accounts propose that it simply shows that moving and flashed objects are processed with different delays, or that it reflects temporal integration in brain areas that encode position and motion. The flash-lag illusion and the hypotheses put forward to explain it lead to interesting questions about the encoding of position in the brain. Where is the 'where' pathway and how does it work?
Comment in
-
Untangling spatial from temporal illusions.Trends Neurosci. 2002 Jun;25(6):293; author reply 294. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02179-3. Trends Neurosci. 2002. PMID: 12086745 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Neuronal processing delays are compensated in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system.Curr Biol. 2003 Nov 11;13(22):1975-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.054. Curr Biol. 2003. PMID: 14614823
-
The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed?Perception. 2000;29(6):675-92. doi: 10.1068/p3066. Perception. 2000. PMID: 11040951
-
Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect.Vision Res. 2004;44(18):2109-28. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.003. Vision Res. 2004. PMID: 15183678
-
Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 22;40(30):5698-5705. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0275-20.2020. J Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32699152 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The flash-lag effect and related mislocalizations: findings, properties, and theories.Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):308-38. doi: 10.1037/a0032899. Epub 2013 Jun 24. Psychol Bull. 2014. PMID: 23796268 Review.
Cited by
-
The flash grab effect.Vision Res. 2013 Oct 18;91:8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Jul 18. Vision Res. 2013. PMID: 23872166 Free PMC article.
-
Audiovisual Temporal Processing in Postlingually Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants.Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 27;8(1):11345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29598-x. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30054512 Free PMC article.
-
Motion extrapolation in the central fovea.PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033651. Epub 2012 Mar 15. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22438976 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic engagement of human motion detectors across space-time coordinates.J Neurosci. 2014 Jun 18;34(25):8449-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5434-13.2014. J Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24948800 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Temporal integration of focus position signal during compensation for pursuit in optic flow.J Vis. 2010 Dec 9;10(14):14. doi: 10.1167/10.14.14. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 21148078 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources