Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jun;4(2):99-108.
doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x.

A measure of informed choice

T M Marteau  1 , E Dormandy, S Michie
Affiliations

A measure of informed choice

T M Marteau et al. Health Expect. 2001 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a measure of informed choice. CONCEPTUALIZATION AND MEASUREMENT: The measure is based on the following definition of an informed choice: one that is based on relevant knowledge, consistent with the decision-maker's values and behaviourally implemented. The measure comprises an eight-item scale of knowledge, a four-item scale assessing attitudes towards undergoing the screening test and a record of test uptake.

Participants: Sixty-six women awaiting their first antenatal clinic appointments. MEASURE DEVELOPMENT: In women offered a screening test in pregnancy, the internal reliability of both the knowledge and the attitude scales was acceptable (alpha coefficients 0.82 and 0.83, respectively). Of the 42 women completing both scales, 18 were classified as having made an informed choice, and 24 were classified as having made an uninformed choice.

Conclusion: The results of this preliminary study provide some evidence to support the feasibility of conceptualizing and measuring informed choices regarding screening using a brief measure assessing knowledge and attitudes. The validity and utility of this approach awaits further studies, involving larger numbers of participants, offered different screening tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classifying choices, based on the three dimensions of knowledge (good, poor), attitudes (positive, negative) and uptake (yes, no).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Department of Health . The Patient’s Charter London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1991.
    1. Raffle AE. Cervical cytology screening 10 years on. Trends in Urology, Gynaecology and Sexual Health, 1998; 3 : 14–16.
    1. Johnston M & Vogele C. Benefits of psychological preparation for surgery: a meta‐analysis. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 1993; 15 : 245–256.
    1. Petticrew MP, Sowden AJ, Lister–sharp D, Wright K. Health Technology Assessment, 2000; 4 (5). - PubMed
    1. Wilson RM. Screening for breast and cervical cancer as a common cause for litigation. British Medical Journal, 2000; 320 : 1352–1353. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types