Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 May;51(466):351-5.

A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks

B Karlsmose et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 May.

Abstract

Background: Prophylactic strategies to counter acquired hearing impairment may involve routine audiometric screening of asymptomatic working-age adults attending general practice for regular health checks.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of adult hearing screening on subsequent noise exposure and hearing.

Design of study: A randomised controlled population-based study of health checks and health discussions in general practice.

Setting: The project was initiated in the district of Ebeltoft, Aarhus county, Denmark.

Method: Intervention group participants' hearing thresholds were determined audiometrically at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz in each ear. Participants were advised to get their ears checked if the average hearing loss exceeded 20 dB hearing level (dBHL) in either ear. Noise avoidance was emphasised when thresholds exceeded 25 dBHL bilaterally at 4 kHz. Follow-up included questionnaires and audiometry.

Results: Hearing loss was observed among 18.9% of the study sample at baseline. At the five-year follow-up we recorded no significant differences between the control and the intervention groups regarding subjective or objective hearing, or exposure to occupational noise. However, there was a tendency towards reduction in exposure to leisure noise among intervention participants (P = 0.045). Approximately 20% reported hearing problems; 16.5% reported tinnitus-related complaints; 0.8% used hearing aids; 35.0% reported frequent noise exposure; and occluding wax was suspected in 2.1%.

Conclusion: Preventive health checks with audiometry did not significantly affect hearing, but leisure noise exposure tended to become less frequent. The poor effect may be ascribed to inadequate audiological counselling or a higher priority to other advice, e.g. on cardiovascular risk or lifestyle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Audiol. 1999 Dec;33(6):395-402 - PubMed
    1. Scand Audiol. 1998;27(3):137-42 - PubMed
    1. Prev Med. 1973 Jun;2(2):278-94 - PubMed
    1. Am Fam Physician. 1983 Oct;28(4):181-6 - PubMed
    1. J Fam Pract. 1986 May;22(5):407-14 - PubMed

Publication types