Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish
- PMID: 11368735
- PMCID: PMC4182102
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.20.2612
Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish
Abstract
Context: Despite the substantial amount of health-related information available on the Internet, little is known about the accessibility, quality, and reading grade level of that health information.
Objective: To evaluate health information on breast cancer, depression, obesity, and childhood asthma available through English- and Spanish-language search engines and Web sites.
Design and setting: Three unique studies were performed from July 2000 through December 2000. Accessibility of 14 search engines was assessed using a structured search experiment. Quality of 25 health Web sites and content provided by 1 search engine was evaluated by 34 physicians using structured implicit review (interrater reliability >0.90). The reading grade level of text selected for structured implicit review was established using the Fry Readability Graph method.
Main outcome measures: For the accessibility study, proportion of links leading to relevant content; for quality, coverage and accuracy of key clinical elements; and grade level reading formulas.
Results: Less than one quarter of the search engine's first pages of links led to relevant content (20% of English and 12% of Spanish). On average, 45% of the clinical elements on English- and 22% on Spanish-language Web sites were more than minimally covered and completely accurate and 24% of the clinical elements on English- and 53% on Spanish-language Web sites were not covered at all. All English and 86% of Spanish Web sites required high school level or greater reading ability.
Conclusion: Accessing health information using search engines and simple search terms is not efficient. Coverage of key information on English- and Spanish-language Web sites is poor and inconsistent, although the accuracy of the information provided is generally good. High reading levels are required to comprehend Web-based health information.
Figures
Comment in
-
Quality of health information on the Internet.JAMA. 2001 Nov 7;286(17):2092-3; author reply 2094-5. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11694139 No abstract available.
-
Quality of health information on the internet.JAMA. 2001 Nov 7;286(17):2093; author reply 2094-5. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11694140 No abstract available.
-
Quality of health information on the Internet.JAMA. 2001 Nov 7;286(17):2093-4; author reply 2094-5. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11694141 No abstract available.
-
Quality of health information on the Internet.JAMA. 2001 Nov 7;286(17):2094-5. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11694142 No abstract available.
References
-
- Fox S, Rainie L. The Online Health Care Revolution: How the Web Helps Americans Take Better Care of Themselves. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts; 2000.
-
- Fox S, Horrigan J, Lenhart A, et al. More online, doing more: 16 million newcomers gain Internet access in the last half of 2000 as women, minorities, and families with modest incomes continue to surge online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; February 2001.
-
- Goldsmith J. How will the Internet change our health system? Health Aff (Millwood) 2000;19:148–156. - PubMed
-
- Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg DR, Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopedic information on the Internet: the case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1540–1543. - PubMed
-
- Biermann JS, Golladay GJ, Greenfield MLVH, Baker LH. Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet. Cancer. 2000;86:381–390. - PubMed
