Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 May 29;356(1409):703-5.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0854.

Conventional immunosuppression and co-stimulation blockade

Affiliations
Review

Conventional immunosuppression and co-stimulation blockade

A B Adams et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Organ transplantation has become an accepted and successful therapeutic intervention for many patients with end-stage organ disease. Current conventional immunosuppressive regimens achieve very good short-term allograft survival but long-term outcomes are less than adequate. Furthermore, non-specific immunosuppression has its attendant side-effects including increased risks of malignancy and infection as well as drug-specific sequellae. With recent advances in the field of immunology, promising new therapies have arisen that could potentially eliminate lifelong drug therapy and promote indefinite acceptance of the donor tissue. Identification of co-stimulatory signals essential for T-cell activation has provided exciting new possibilities for controlling the alloimmune response. The compatibility of these new agents with proven conventional therapeutics has yielded mixed results. When used in combination, their immunosuppressive properties appear synergistic. However, if the goal of therapy is sustained, specific T-cell hyporesponsiveness, many conventional agents antagonize the effects of co-stimulatory blockade in several immune tolerance models.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources