Benefits and limits of hepatic resection for gastric metastases

Abstract

Background: The significance of hepatic resection for gastric metastases has been controversial.

Methods: Forty consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection for gastric metastases were reviewed to examine the benefits and the limits of hepatic resection using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: The overall survival was 27% at 2 years, 18% at 5 years, and 11% at 10 years. Six patients survived more than 5 years. All of the 6 patients underwent anatomical hepatic resection more extensive than segmentectomy, with sufficient resection margin. There were recurrences in 31 patients, and 94% of the recurrences were in the remaining liver. Univariate analysis showed time of hepatic metastases (P = 0.0078) and resection margin (P = 0.024) as significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis indicated that only time of hepatic metastases was an independent prognostic factor that influenced survival.

Conclusions: These results suggest that in patients with synchronous metastases we should consider patient selection more strictly, and that in patients with metachronous metastases we should perform anatomical hepatic resection with sufficient resection margin.