Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 May 12;357(9267):1478-84.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04644-4.

Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial

V Georgoulias et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Docetaxel in combination with cisplatin or gemcitabine are active chemotherapy reigimes against non-small-cell lung cancer. We compared the efficacy and safety of a combination of cisplatin and docetaxel (group 1) with that of gemcitabine and docetaxel (group 2) in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial.

Methods: Patients with stage IIIB or IV lung cancer who had not had prior chemotherapy were allocated either to group 1 and treated with docetaxel (100 mg/m(2), day 1) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), day 2) or to group 2 and treated with gemcitabine (1100 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8) and docetaxel (100 mg/m(2), day 8). All patients received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 mg/m(2)). All patients received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 mg/m(2)) had appropriate standard premedication. Response and toxicity were assessed using WHO criteria. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Findings: 441 patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel/cisplatin (group 1, n=219) or gemcitabine/docetaxel (group 2, n=222). 14 patients in group 1 and 21 patients in group 2 were not evaluable. Objective response rates were similar in the two groups: group 1, 32.4% (95% CI 26.2-38.6%; 1.4% complete response and 31% partial response); group 2, 30.2% (24.5-36.2%; 0.9% complete response and 29.3% partial response). The two groups did not differ in median duration of response, time to tumour progression, overall survival, or 1 year or 2 year survival rates.

Interpretation: Both drug combinations had comparable activity in patients with advanced cancer who had not previously had chemotherapy; however, gemcitabine and docetaxel had the most favourable toxicity profile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Satoh H, Sekizawa K. Satoh H, et al. Lancet. 2001 Oct 13;358(9289):1270-1; author reply 1271-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06362-0. Lancet. 2001. PMID: 11675089 No abstract available.
  • Chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
    van Meerbeeck JP, Legrand C, van Klaveren RJ, Giaccone G; EORTC Lung Cancer Group. van Meerbeeck JP, et al. Lancet. 2001 Oct 13;358(9289):1271-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06363-2. Lancet. 2001. PMID: 11675091 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources