Cost effectiveness of continuous terbinafine compared with intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis: an analysis of based on results from the L.I.ON. study. Lamisil versus Itraconazole in Onychomycosis
- PMID: 11383756
- DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119040-00007
Cost effectiveness of continuous terbinafine compared with intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis: an analysis of based on results from the L.I.ON. study. Lamisil versus Itraconazole in Onychomycosis
Abstract
Objective: To compare the costs and effectiveness of 2 oral antifungal treatment regimens in patients with dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis.
Design and methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis using a model based on data from the Lamisil versus Itraconazole in Onychomycosis (L.I.ON.) study, a randomised controlled trial comparing continuous terbinafine with intermittent itraconazole. The trial included 4 treatment arms: terbinafine 250 mg/day for 12 or 16 weeks (T12, T16) and itraconazole 400 mg/day for 1 week in every 4 weeks for 12 or 16 weeks (I3, I4). Cost calculations for 6 countries (Finland, Germany, Iceland, Italy, The Netherlands, UK) included costs for medication, physician visits, laboratory tests, management of adverse events and management of relapse. Effectiveness was based on complete cure rates (mycological cure plus 100% toenail clearing). Costs per complete cure were determined and both average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated.
Perspective: Healthcare system.
Main outcome measures and results: In the L.I.ON. study, terbinafine was seen to be more effective than itraconazole (cure rates, 45.8 vs 23.4%). In most comparisons (5 of the 6 countries), the costs of T12 were statistically significantly lower than those of I3 [range: -37 to -173 euros (EUR); 1998 values; 1.172 US dollars = EUR1], indicating that T12 was the dominant strategy (i.e. less expensive and more effective). One exception (Finland) showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR524 per additional cure. In the other 5 countries, T16 and 14 were essentially equal in cost, but the greater effectiveness of T16 (cure rates, 55.1 vs 25.9%) resulted in a situation of extended dominance.
Conclusion: From a healthcare system perspective, continuous terbinafine is less costly and more effective than intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis.
Similar articles
-
L.I.ON. Study: efficacy and tolerability of continuous terbinafine (Lamisil) compared to intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Lamisil vs. Itraconazole in Onychomycosis.Br J Dermatol. 1999 Nov;141 Suppl 56:5-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.00008.x. Br J Dermatol. 1999. PMID: 10730908 Clinical Trial.
-
Double blind, randomised study of continuous terbinafine compared with intermittent itraconazole in treatment of toenail onychomycosis. The LION Study Group.BMJ. 1999 Apr 17;318(7190):1031-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7190.1031. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10205099 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Economic evaluation of antifungal agents in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis in Germany.Dermatology. 1996;193(3):239-44. doi: 10.1159/000246254. Dermatology. 1996. PMID: 8944348
-
Terbinafine: a review of its use in onychomycosis in adults.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(1):39-65. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200304010-00005. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003. PMID: 12477372 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of two new treatments for onychomycosis: an analysis of two comparative clinical trials.J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 May;38(5 Pt 3):S69-72. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70488-8. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998. PMID: 9594941 Review.
Cited by
-
Adherence of pharmacoeconomic studies to national guidelines in the Netherlands.Pharm World Sci. 2005 Oct;27(5):364-70. doi: 10.1007/s11096-005-7904-y. Pharm World Sci. 2005. PMID: 16341742
-
A Week of Oral Terbinafine Pulse Regimen Every Three Months to Treat all Dermatophyte Onychomycosis.J Fungi (Basel). 2019 Sep 4;5(3):82. doi: 10.3390/jof5030082. J Fungi (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31487828 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources