Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Jun;7(2):110-7.

Delivery of injectable agents for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: evolving techniques

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11383988
Review

Delivery of injectable agents for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: evolving techniques

R R Dmochowski et al. Tech Urol. 2001 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Periurethral bulking agents continue to be used as a minimally invasive alternative for management of stress urinary incontinence in men and women. Agents and delivery techniques will be evaluated and compared.

Materials and methods: The only agents currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) include glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen, autologous fat, and carbon bead/carrier gel technology. Several other agents are undergoing FDA trial evaluation. These agents differ in material characteristics (particle size, viscosity) that, in some cases, produce different immediate and delayed tissue responses or reactions.

Results: Initial subjective cure rates with collagen are acceptable, but the majority of women require reinjection. The risk of allergic phenomena complicates collagen use. Carbon-based material appears to parallel collagen in durability, with the significant advantage of a nonimmunogenic response within host tissues. Autologous fat injection achieves early results similar to those with collagen, but is limited by resorption and fibrous replacement as well as local discomfort associated with harvesting procedures. Experience with newer agents is limited. Patient characteristics also influence response to injectable agents.

Conclusions: Injectable agent materials and delivery techniques continue to evolve. The optimal material is yet to be defined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources