Birth order, family size, and the risk of cancer in young and middle-aged adults
- PMID: 11384095
- PMCID: PMC2363659
- DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1811
Birth order, family size, and the risk of cancer in young and middle-aged adults
Abstract
We used the Swedish Family-Cancer Database to analyse the effects of birth order and family size on the risk of common cancers among offspring born over the period 1958-96. Some 1.38 million offspring up to age 55 years with 50.6 million person-years were included. Poisson regression analysis included age at diagnosis, birth cohort, socio-economic status and region of residence as other explanatory variables. The only significant associations were an increasing risk for breast cancer by birth order and a decreasing risk for melanoma by birth order and, particularly, by family size. When details of the women's own reproductive history were included in analysis, birth orders 5-17 showed a relative risk of 1.41. The effects on breast cancer may be mediated through increasing birth weight by birth order. For melanoma, socio-economic factors may be involved, such as limited affordability of sun tourism in large families. Testis cancer showed no significant effect and prostate cancer was excluded from analysis because of the small number of cases.
Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of bias in familial risk estimates: a study of common cancers using Swedish population-based registers.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1318-25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn290. Epub 2008 Sep 9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008. PMID: 18780865
-
Familial risk of cancer shortly after diagnosis of the first familial tumor.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Nov 2;97(21):1575-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji338. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. PMID: 16264177
-
A cohort study of cancer risk in relation to family histories of cancer in the Utah population database.Cancer. 2005 May 1;103(9):1906-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20989. Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15779016
-
Adult Cancers in Adolescents and Young Adults.Prog Tumor Res. 2016;43:64-73. doi: 10.1159/000447072. Epub 2016 Sep 5. Prog Tumor Res. 2016. PMID: 27595357 Review.
-
The more the merrier? Effects of family size and sibling spacing on sibling relationships.Child Care Health Dev. 1996 Sep;22(5):285-302. Child Care Health Dev. 1996. PMID: 8879754 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Greater family size is associated with less cancer risk: an ecological analysis of 178 countries.BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 26;18(1):924. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4837-0. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30257658 Free PMC article.
-
Number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study.Br J Cancer. 2007 Jun 4;96(11):1755-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603760. Epub 2007 Apr 24. Br J Cancer. 2007. PMID: 17453006 Free PMC article.
-
Family size and cardiovascular disease incidence: a population-level association study.Future Sci OA. 2025 Dec;11(1):2495537. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2495537. Epub 2025 May 6. Future Sci OA. 2025. PMID: 40327430 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review.Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(1):R8. doi: 10.1186/bcr1850. Epub 2008 Jan 21. Breast Cancer Res. 2008. PMID: 18205956 Free PMC article.
-
Familial risk of early and late onset cancer: nationwide prospective cohort study.BMJ. 2012 Dec 20;345:e8076. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8076. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 23257063 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical