Memory for faces, shoes, and objects by deaf and hearing signers and hearing nonsigners
- PMID: 11385825
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1010329912848
Memory for faces, shoes, and objects by deaf and hearing signers and hearing nonsigners
Abstract
The visual spatial memory of 15 deaf signers, 15 hearing signers, and 15 hearing nonsigners for shoes, faces, and verbalizable objects was measured using the game Concentration. It was hypothesized that the deaf and hearing signers would require fewer attempts than the hearing nonsigners on the shoes and faces tasks because of their experience of using a visual-spatial language; and, in the case of the Deaf, also possibly, due to a compensatory mechanism. It was also hypothesized that memory for shoes would be more like that for faces than for simple objects. It was also anticipated that there would be no difference between the three group's memories for verbalizable objects. Deaf signers were found to be similar to hearing signers, both of whom were better than hearing nonsigners on the faces and shoes tasks. Generally, performance on the faces and shoes tasks was similar and followed the same pattern for the three groups. The three groups performed at a similar level on the objects task. There were no gender differences.
Similar articles
-
Memory for faces and objects by deaf and hearing signers and hearing nonsigners.J Psycholinguist Res. 1998 Jul;27(4):481-97. doi: 10.1023/a:1023277220438. J Psycholinguist Res. 1998. PMID: 9691334
-
Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.Neuropsychology. 2007 Jan;21(1):114-21. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.1.114. Neuropsychology. 2007. PMID: 17201534
-
Neural Activity During Mental Rotation in Deaf Signers: The Influence of Long-Term Sign Language Experience.Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):1015-1024. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000540. Ear Hear. 2018. PMID: 29298164
-
Signed language working memory capacity of signed language interpreters and deaf signers.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013 Apr;18(2):271-86. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens068. Epub 2013 Jan 9. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013. PMID: 23303377 Review.
-
Sign language and Chinese characters on visual-spatial memory: a literature review.Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Dec;97(3 Pt 1):797-802. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.3.797. Percept Mot Skills. 2003. PMID: 14738343 Review.
Cited by
-
The signing body: extensive sign language practice shapes the size of hands and face.Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jul;239(7):2233-2249. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06121-9. Epub 2021 May 24. Exp Brain Res. 2021. PMID: 34028597 Free PMC article.
-
Don't Assume Deaf Students are Visual Learners.J Dev Phys Disabil. 2017 Feb;29(1):153-171. doi: 10.1007/s10882-016-9494-0. Epub 2016 Jun 2. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2017. PMID: 28344430 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Hearing Status and Sign Language Use on Working Memory.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Apr;21(2):148-55. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env070. Epub 2016 Jan 10. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016. PMID: 26755684 Free PMC article.
-
Cortical plasticity for visuospatial processing and object recognition in deaf and hearing signers.Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):661-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.031. Epub 2011 Dec 22. Neuroimage. 2012. PMID: 22210355 Free PMC article.
-
Scoping Review of Systems to Train Psychomotor Skills in Hearing Impaired Children.Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 3;18(8):2546. doi: 10.3390/s18082546. Sensors (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30081512 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical