Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jun 2;322(7298):1330-3.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1330.

Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? Observational case series

D J Tuffnell  1 , K Wilkinson, N Beresford
Affiliations

Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? Observational case series

D J Tuffnell et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To audit interval from decision to delivery in urgent caesarean section to determine whether the current standard of 30 minutes is achievable routinely; to determine whether delay leads to an excess of admissions to special care.

Design: Three audit cycles over four years followed by a continuous audit over 32 months.

Setting: Large district general hospital delivering 5500 women each year.

Participants: All women delivered by urgent caesarean section for abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, cord prolapse, failed instrumental delivery, or suspected placental abruption.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of women delivered within 30 and 40 minutes of decision. Admission rates to special care by length of interval between decision and delivery.

Results: In the continuous audit 478 of 721 (66.3%) women were delivered in 30 minutes and 637 (88.3%) within 40 minutes; 29 (4.0%) were undelivered at 50 minutes. If the woman was taken to theatre in 10 minutes, 409 of 500 (81.8%) were delivered in 30 minutes and 495 (97%) in 40 minutes. There was no significant difference in the proportion of babies born at 36 weeks or later who were admitted to special care, when analysed by interval from decision to delivery. 36/449 (8%) babies with an interval from decision to delivery of less than 30 minutes were admitted to special care and 3/23 (13%) with an interval of more than 50 minutes were admitted.

Conclusions: The current recommendations for the interval between decision and delivery are not being achieved in routine practice. Failure to meet the recommendations does not seem to increase neonatal morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland; Obstetric Anaesthetists Association. Guidelines for obstetric anaesthesia services. London: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, Obstetric Anaesthetists Association; 1998.
    1. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Organisational standards for maternity services. London: Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 1995. Anaesthesia cover should be audited along with response times involving anaesthesia; p. 36.
    1. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Royal College of Midwives. Towards safer childbirth. London: Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Royal College of Midwives; 1999. Developing standards; pp. 17–18.
    1. Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts. Clinical risk management standards. London, 1999. (Criterion 12;3;1.)
    1. Focus Group. Confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. 7th annual report. London: Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium; 2000. Obstetric anaesthesia delays and complications; pp. 41–52.