Ethical research issues: going beyond the Declaration of Helsinki
- PMID: 11387860
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1009515621157
Ethical research issues: going beyond the Declaration of Helsinki
Abstract
La Vaque and Rossiter made a strong, supported argument that it is unethical to use a "no treatment" control group in a research study if a known, effective treatment is available. Their argument is based on the supposition that the Declaration of Helsinki is the ethical world standard for research with humans. Their argument appears to be straightforward, but is not simple to apply. The issues are very complex, include issues not discussed in their argument, and can lead to a different conclusion as pointed out in this paper. The World Medical Association developed the Declaration of Helsinki as one of their official policies. The Declaration of Helsinki, however, is not accepted as the world ethical standard, as demonstrated by its lack of adoption by many professional associations or even by the United States Federal Government. Perhaps it is not mentioned because its ethical provisions are aspirational rather than mandatory as implied by La Vaque and Rossiter. Researchers and clinicians should also be aware of other ethical issues not directly discussed in the La Vaque and Rossiter paper. The Belmont Report is the basis for the ethical protection of human research subjects for at least 17 federal agencies and does not mention the Declaration of Helsinki. The Belmont Report mentions several ethical principles that form the basis for informed consent, risk/benefit assessment, confidentiality of data, subject selection, Institutional Review Boards, and other protections needed when doing research with human subjects. At least 2 of these core principles have direct implications to the discussion related to the use of placebo controls. The ethical principle of fidelity is also important in guiding research activities with human subjects. Researchers should be familiar with the La Vaque and Rossiter argument, the Belmont Report, and the federal policies developed to implement the provisions of that report, for example, Regulation 45 CFR 46.
Comment in
-
The ethics of placebo controlled clinical research and applied psychophysiology.Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2001 Mar;26(1):17-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1009511520249. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2001. PMID: 11387858 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):14-8. J Am Coll Dent. 2014. PMID: 25951678
-
The revised Declaration of Helsinki--is justice served?Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Feb;40(2):76-83. doi: 10.5414/cpp40076. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002. PMID: 11862976
-
The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;57(6):695-713. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02103.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15151515 Free PMC article.
-
Legal and ethical issues in research.Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;60(9):684-688. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.190627. Indian J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27729698 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical and institutional review board issues.Adv Neurol. 1998;76:253-62. Adv Neurol. 1998. PMID: 9408484 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources