Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Jun;138(6):845-50.
doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.114017.

Long-term comparative trial of positive expiratory pressure versus oscillating positive expiratory pressure (flutter) physiotherapy in the treatment of cystic fibrosis

P M McIlwaine  1 , L T Wong, D Peacock, A G Davidson
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Long-term comparative trial of positive expiratory pressure versus oscillating positive expiratory pressure (flutter) physiotherapy in the treatment of cystic fibrosis

P M McIlwaine et al. J Pediatr. 2001 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the long-term effects of physiotherapy with an oscillating positive pressure device ("flutter") compared with physiotherapy with the use of a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).

Study design: Forty children with CF were randomly assigned to performing physiotherapy with the PEP mask or the flutter device for 1 year. Clinical status, pulmonary function, and compliance were measured at regular intervals throughout the study.

Results: The flutter group demonstrated a greater mean annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity compared with the PEP group (-8.62 +/- 15.5 vs 0.06 +/- 7.9; P =.05) with a similar trend in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (-10.95 +/- 19.96 vs -1.24 +/- 9.9; P =.08). There was a significant decline in Huang scores (P =.05), increased hospitalizations (18 vs 5; P =.03), and antibiotic use in the flutter group.

Conclusion: Flutter was not as effective in maintaining pulmonary function in this group of patients with CF compared with PEP and was more costly because of the increased number of hospitalizations and antibiotic use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types