The impact of pamidronate on inpatient and outpatient services among metastatic breast cancer patients
- PMID: 11401101
- DOI: 10.1007/s005200000193
The impact of pamidronate on inpatient and outpatient services among metastatic breast cancer patients
Abstract
Our goal was to evaluate the impact of pamidronate therapy on medical resource utilization for treatment of bone metastases among patients with breast cancer. In this 12-center retrospective study, inpatient and outpatient resource utilization was abstracted from the medical charts of 295 patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed with bone metastases between July 1996 and April 1999. Data were abstracted from the time of bone metastasis diagnosis (baseline) to the present. The analysis compared non-pamidronate patients against pamidronate patients, who were stratified on the basis of whether their pamidronate therapy had been initiated within 3 months (early pamidronate group) or more than 3 months (late pamidronate group) after diagnosis. Resource utilization was compared among groups using multivariate regression analyses. A total of 101 early pamidronate, 72 late pamidronate, and 122 non-pamidronate patients were included in the analysis. The results showed that the early pamidronate group was roughly one-half as likely to have unplanned office visits attributable to bone metastases as the late pamidronate and non-pamidronate groups. The groups had a similar likelihood of ever being hospitalized for bone-related conditions; however, among those hospitalized, there were roughly one-half as many bone-related hospitalizations in the late pamidronate group as in the non-pamidronate group. Also, the mean length of stay was approximately 50% shorter in both pamidronate groups than in the non-pamidronate group. We conclude that pamidronate therapy may be associated with less medical resource utilization, particularly among patients hospitalized for bone-related conditions.
Similar articles
-
[Two bedridden patients with bone metastases from breast cancer effectively treated with pamidronate therapy].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000 Oct;27(11):1751-4. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000. PMID: 11057329 Japanese.
-
Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials.Cancer. 2000 Mar 1;88(5):1082-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<1082::aid-cncr20>3.0.co;2-z. Cancer. 2000. PMID: 10699899 Clinical Trial.
-
A remarkable improvement of clinical manifestations in a breast cancer patient with widespread bone metastases after administration of pamidronate.Intern Med. 1997 Dec;36(12):926-30. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.36.926. Intern Med. 1997. PMID: 9475253
-
[Pamidronate in the treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer].Magy Onkol. 2002;46(3):225-33. Epub 2002 Oct 6. Magy Onkol. 2002. PMID: 12368918 Review. Hungarian.
-
Bisphosphonates for cancer patients: why, how, and when?Support Care Cancer. 2002 Jul;10(5):399-407. doi: 10.1007/s005200100292. Epub 2001 Oct 19. Support Care Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12136223 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate compared with intravenous (i.v.) zoledronic acid or i.v. generic pamidronate in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease undergoing i.v. chemotherapy.Support Care Cancer. 2005 Dec;13(12):975-86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0828-1. Epub 2005 May 4. Support Care Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15871033
-
Clinical and economic issues in the treatment of advanced breast cancer with bisphosphonates.Drugs Aging. 2003;20(9):631-42. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200320090-00001. Drugs Aging. 2003. PMID: 12831288 Review.
-
Cost analysis of secondary prophylaxis with oral clodronate versus pamidronate in metastatic breast cancer patients.Support Care Cancer. 2004 Dec;12(12):844-51. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0659-5. Epub 2004 Jul 3. Support Care Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15235902
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous