Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique
- PMID: 11402593
- DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70150-6
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique
Abstract
Ongoing progress in laparoscopy has permitted extension of its indications for performance of complex oncologic and reconstructive surgeries such as radical prostatectomy. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is now feasible when performed by urologists trained in laparoscopy. Although the procedure is technically rewarding, it is more important to evaluate it in regards to efficacy. The short-term oncologic and functional efficacy rates (regarding urinary continence) seem equivalent to the rates for open surgery. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the preservation of potency with the laparoscopic technique. The integration and application of open nerve-sparing techniques to the laparoscopic approach should be feasible owing to the excellent visual accuracy at the prostatic apex. Initially, the operating time is lengthy (> 7 hours), but the length improves considerably with each series of 20 or more cases. Overall, the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is approximately 50 cases. Whether the laparoscopic approach will ever be as time efficient for the urologist as open radical prostatectomy remains to be seen. The authors' preliminary impression from the patient's perspective is that laparoscopic prostatectomy may offer significant advantages over open surgery in terms of the immediate postoperative quality-of-life concerns.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.Can J Urol. 2004 Apr;11(2):2172-85. Can J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15182406
-
[Study of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Comparison between laparoscopic and retropubic prostatectomy based on a series of 251 cases].Prog Urol. 2008 Jun;18(6):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2008.03.010. Epub 2008 May 15. Prog Urol. 2008. PMID: 18558325 French.
-
Laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a case-control study at a single institution.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010 Jun;82(2):109-12. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010. PMID: 20812535
-
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: current techniques.Curr Opin Urol. 2007 Mar;17(2):98-103. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32802b7094. Curr Opin Urol. 2007. PMID: 17285018 Review.
-
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: is it feasible and reasonable?Urol Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;28(3):655-61. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70169-5. Urol Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11590820 Review.
Cited by
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: four cases.Yonsei Med J. 2007 Apr 30;48(2):341-6. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.2.341. Yonsei Med J. 2007. PMID: 17461539 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging role of robotics in urology.J Minim Access Surg. 2005 Oct;1(4):202-10. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.19268. J Minim Access Surg. 2005. PMID: 21206664 Free PMC article.
-
Intensive laparoscopic training: the impact of a simplified pelvic-trainer model for the urethrovesical anastomosis on the learning curve.World J Urol. 2006 Aug;24(3):331-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0076-0. Epub 2006 Apr 11. World J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16607548
-
Comparison of suture material for vesico-urethral anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy.Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(2):134-139. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0105. Epub 2020 Jun 22. Cent European J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32782831 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological outcome analysis from a single-center Indian experience of 6 years.Indian J Urol. 2012 Jan;28(1):32-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.94953. Indian J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22557714 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous