Reaction time in automated kinetic perimetry: effects of stimulus luminance, eccentricity, and movement direction
- PMID: 11403799
- DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00088-8
Reaction time in automated kinetic perimetry: effects of stimulus luminance, eccentricity, and movement direction
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effects of stimulus eccentricity and luminance level on the reaction time (RT) of young normal volunteers during automated kinetic campimetry.
Methods: We used a specially designed video-campimetric device equipped with a continuous infrared (IR) pupillographic fixation control (Tübingen Computer Campimeter) and recorded reaction times upon presenting horizontally moving small circular stimuli (size 26'; constant angular velocity 2 degrees /s) starting at 16 locations within the central 30 degrees -radius of the visual field. Two different levels of stimulus luminance were used (41.6 cd/m(2) and 110 cd/m(2)), while background luminance was 10 cd/m(2). Each stimulus was presented a total of six times in a randomized order. Subjects were 12 healthy young individuals (aged 21-30 years) with normal ophthalmic examinations. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the data.
Results: RTs showed considerable inter- and intra-individual variation with individual least squares means (LSM, fitted values of a linear model) ranging from 305 to 454 ms, and residual standard deviation (R.S.D.) 66 ms. Reaction times did not differ significantly as a function of stimulus direction (P>0.6). Higher luminance levels produced significantly reduced reaction times for all stimulus locations and directions (mean reduction: 16 ms; P<0.0001). Reaction times increased with increasing eccentricity, in the mean by 1.8 ms per degree of visual angle, from 365+/-4 ms (S.E.M.) foveally, to 407+/-2 ms at 30 degrees eccentricity; (P<0.0001).
Conclusions: Automated kinetic perimetry should be designed to cope with significant, variable interindividual response characteristics. Other stimulus related factors, such as eccentricity or luminance level, have a significant but comparatively small effect on reaction time within the central 30 degrees -radius visual field in healthy young individuals.
Similar articles
-
Factors influencing reaction time during automated kinetic perimetry on the Tübingen computer campimeter.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2633-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1413. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005. PMID: 15980258
-
The relationship of visual threshold and reaction time to visual field eccentricity with conventional automated perimetry.Vision Res. 2002 Mar;42(6):781-7. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00311-x. Vision Res. 2002. PMID: 11888543
-
Scotoma mapping by semi-automated kinetic perimetry: the effects of stimulus properties and the speed of subjects' responses.Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Jun;84(3):338-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00624.x. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006. PMID: 16704695
-
The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry.Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun;114(6):1065-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.030. Epub 2007 Feb 28. Ophthalmology. 2007. PMID: 17331580
-
[Age-dependent error rates in automatic screen campimetry with bright and dark stimuli].Ophthalmologe. 1999 Dec;96(12):813-21. doi: 10.1007/s003470050501. Ophthalmologe. 1999. PMID: 10643316 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Stimulus intensity modifies saccadic reaction time and visual response latency in the superior colliculus.Exp Brain Res. 2006 Sep;174(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0420-z. Epub 2006 Mar 10. Exp Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16528494
-
The Tölz Temporal Topography Study: mapping the visual field across the life span. Part I: the topography of light detection and temporal-information processing.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Aug;74(6):1114-32. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0278-z. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012. PMID: 22484795 Free PMC article.
-
The Tölz Temporal Topography Study: mapping the visual field across the life span. Part II: cognitive factors shaping visual field maps.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Aug;74(6):1133-44. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0279-y. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012. PMID: 22528607 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of kinetic programs in various automated perimeters.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;61(4):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s10384-017-0516-y. Epub 2017 Apr 25. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28444485
-
Perceived timing of vestibular stimulation relative to touch, light and sound.Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(2-3):221-31. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1779-4. Epub 2009 Apr 8. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19352639
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources