Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jun;5(3):153-7.
doi: 10.1067/mpa.2001.114662.

The role of anisometropia in the development of accommodative esotropia

Affiliations

The role of anisometropia in the development of accommodative esotropia

D R Weakley Jr et al. J AAPOS. 2001 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether anisometropia increases the risk for the development of accommodative esotropia with hypermetropia.

Methods: Records of all new patients with a refractive error of +2.00 D or more (mean spherical equivalent of both eyes) over a 42-month period were reviewed. Three hundred forty-five patients were thus analyzed to determine the effect of anisometropia (>or=1 D) on the relative risk of developing accommodative esotropia and of developing unsatisfactory control with spectacles once esotropia was present.

Results: Anisometropia (>or=1 D) increased the relative risk of developing accommodative esotropia to 1.68 (P < .05). Anisometropia (>or=1 D) increased the relative risk for esotropia to 7.8 (P < .05) in patients with a mean spherical equivalent less than +3.00 D and increased it to 1.49 (P < .05) in patients with a mean spherical equivalent of +3.00 D or more (P = .016). In patients with esotropia and anisometropia (>or=1 D), the relative risk for a deviation that was unsatisfactorily controlled with spectacles was 1.72 (P < .05) compared with patients with esotropia but without anisometropia. Unsatisfactorily controlled esotropia was present in 33% of patients with anisometropia versus 0% of patients without anisometropia, with a mean hypermetropic spherical equivalent of less than +3.00 D (P = .003); however, anisometropia did not significantly increase the relative risk of unsatisfactory control of esotropia with spectacles in patients with a hypermetropic spherical equivalent of +3.00 D or more. Although amblyopia and anisometropia were closely associated, anisometropia increased the relative risk for esotropia to 2.14 (P < .05), even in the absence of amblyopia.

Conclusions: Anisometropia (>or=1 D) is a significant risk factor for the development of accommodative esotropia, especially in patients with lower overall hypermetropia (>+3.00 D). Anisometropia also increases the risk that an accommodative esotropia will not be satisfactorily aligned with spectacles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources