Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001;2001(2):CD002246.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002246.

Interventions for promoting smoke alarm ownership and function

Affiliations

Interventions for promoting smoke alarm ownership and function

C DiGuiseppi et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001.

Abstract

Background: Residential fires caused at least 67 deaths and 2,500 non-fatal injuries to children aged 0-16 in the United Kingdom in 1998. Smoke alarm ownership is associated with a reduced risk of residential fire death.

Objectives: We evaluated interventions to promote residential smoke alarms, to assess their effect on smoke alarm ownership, smoke alarm function, fires and burns and other fire-related injuries.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Injuries Group database, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycLIT, CINAHL, ERIC, Dissertation Abstracts, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, ISTP, FIREDOC and LRC. Conference proceedings, published case studies, and bibliographies were systematically searched, and investigators and relevant organisations were contacted, to identify trials.

Selection criteria: Randomised, quasi-randomised or nonrandomised controlled trials completed or published after 1969 evaluating an intervention to promote residential smoke alarms.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality.

Main results: We identified 26 trials, of which 13 were randomised. Overall, counselling and educational interventions had only a modest effect on the likelihood of owning an alarm (OR=1.26; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.82) or having a functional alarm (OR=1.19; 0.85 to 1.66). Counselling as part of primary care child health surveillance had greater effects on ownership (OR=1.96; 1.03 to 3.72) and function (OR=1.72; 0.78 to 3.80). Results were sensitive to trial quality, however, and effects on fire-related injuries were not reported. In two non randomised trials, direct provision of free alarms significantly increased functioning alarms and reduced fire-related injuries. Media and community education showed little benefit in non randomised trials.

Reviewer's conclusions: Counselling as part of child health surveillance may increase smoke alarm ownership and function, but its effects on injuries are unevaluated. Community smoke alarm give-away programmes apparently reduce fire-related injuries, but these trials were not randomised and results must be interpreted cautiously. Further efforts to promote smoke alarms in primary care or through give-away programmes should be evaluated by adequately designed randomised controlled trials measuring injury outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Smoke alarm promotion versus control, Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Smoke alarm promotion versus control, Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarms.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Smoke alarm promotion versus control, Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Smoke alarm promotion versus control, Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Smoke alarm promotion as part of routine child health surveillance versus control (subgroup analysis), Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Smoke alarm promotion as part of routine child health surveillance versus control (subgroup analysis), Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarms.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Smoke alarm promotion as part of routine child health surveillance versus control (subgroup analysis), Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Smoke alarm promotion as part of routine child health surveillance versus control (subgroup analysis), Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Discounted or free smoke alarms versus control (subgroup analysis), Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 Discounted or free smoke alarms versus control (subgroup analysis), Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarms.
3.3
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3 Discounted or free smoke alarms versus control (subgroup analysis), Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
3.4
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3 Discounted or free smoke alarms versus control (subgroup analysis), Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Smoke alarm promotion versus control by allocation concealment (subgroup analysis), Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
4.2
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 Smoke alarm promotion versus control by allocation concealment (subgroup analysis), Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarm.
4.3
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4 Smoke alarm promotion versus control by allocation concealment (subgroup analysis), Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
4.4
4.4. Analysis
Comparison 4 Smoke alarm promotion versus control by allocation concealment (subgroup analysis), Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.
5.1
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5 Smoke alarm promotion versus control by blinding of outcome assessment (subgroup analysis), Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
5.2
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5 Smoke alarm promotion versus control by blinding of outcome assessment (subgroup analysis), Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarm.
5.3
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5 Smoke alarm promotion versus control by blinding of outcome assessment (subgroup analysis), Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
5.4
5.4. Analysis
Comparison 5 Smoke alarm promotion versus control by blinding of outcome assessment (subgroup analysis), Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.
6.1
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6 Smoke alarm installation versus vouchers for free alarms, Outcome 1 Final functioning smoke alarms.
7.1
7.1. Analysis
Comparison 7 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding families with injured children, Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
7.2
7.2. Analysis
Comparison 7 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding families with injured children, Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarms.
7.3
7.3. Analysis
Comparison 7 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding families with injured children, Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
7.4
7.4. Analysis
Comparison 7 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding families with injured children, Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.
8.1
8.1. Analysis
Comparison 8 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding interventions implemented by research assistants, Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
8.2
8.2. Analysis
Comparison 8 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding interventions implemented by research assistants, Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarms.
8.3
8.3. Analysis
Comparison 8 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding interventions implemented by research assistants, Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
8.4
8.4. Analysis
Comparison 8 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding interventions implemented by research assistants, Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.
9.1
9.1. Analysis
Comparison 9 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding Kendrick 1999, Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
9.2
9.2. Analysis
Comparison 9 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding Kendrick 1999, Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarms.
9.3
9.3. Analysis
Comparison 9 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding Kendrick 1999, Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
9.4
9.4. Analysis
Comparison 9 Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding Kendrick 1999, Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.
10.1
10.1. Analysis
Comparison 10 Smoke alarm promotion versus control without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
10.2
10.2. Analysis
Comparison 10 Smoke alarm promotion versus control without cluster adjustment, Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarms.
10.3
10.3. Analysis
Comparison 10 Smoke alarm promotion versus control without cluster adjustment, Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
10.4
10.4. Analysis
Comparison 10 Smoke alarm promotion versus control without cluster adjustment, Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.
11.1
11.1. Analysis
Comparison 11 Smoke alarm promotion versus control using greater ICC for cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Final smoke alarm ownership.
11.2
11.2. Analysis
Comparison 11 Smoke alarm promotion versus control using greater ICC for cluster adjustment, Outcome 2 Final functioning smoke alarms.
11.3
11.3. Analysis
Comparison 11 Smoke alarm promotion versus control using greater ICC for cluster adjustment, Outcome 3 Smoke alarms acquired.
11.4
11.4. Analysis
Comparison 11 Smoke alarm promotion versus control using greater ICC for cluster adjustment, Outcome 4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired.

References

References to studies included in this review

Barone 1988 {published data only}
    1. Barone VJ. An analysis of well‐child parenting classes: the extent of parent compliance with health‐care recommendations to decrease potential injury of their toddlers. [Dissertation]. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas 1988.
Clamp 1998 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Clamp M, Kendrick D. A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years. BMJ 1998;316:1576‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Davis 1987 {published data only}
    1. Davis JW. Get Fired Up: a model for developing inschool Four‐H programs (safety) [dissertation]. Clemson, SC: Clemson University, 1987.
DiGuiseppi 2002 {published data only}
    1. DiGuiseppi C, Roberts I, Wade A, Sculpher M, Edwards P, Godward C, et al. Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002;325(7371):995. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DiGuiseppi C, Roberts I, Wade A, Sculpher M, Edwards P, Godward C, et al. The 'Let's Get Alarmed!' initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme. Injury Prevention 1999;5(3):177‐82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DiGuiseppi C, Slater S, Roberts I. Increasing the prevalence of smoke alarms: a community give‐away programme targeted to low income households. 4th World Conference on Injury Prevention and Control, Amsterdam. 1998.
Gielen 2001 {published data only}
    1. Chen LH, Gielen AC, MacDonald EM. Validity of self reported home safety practices. Injury Prevention 2003;9(1):73‐5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gielen AC, Wilson MEH, McDonald EM, Serwint JR, Andrews JS, Hwang W, et al. Randomized trial of enhanced anticipatory guidance for injury prevention. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2001;155:42‐9. - PubMed
Gielen 2002 {published data only}
    1. Gielen AC, McDonald EM, Wilson ME, Hwang WT, Serwint JR, Andrews JS, et al. Effects of improved access to safety counseling, products, and home visits on parents' safety practices: results of a randomised controlled trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2002;156(1):33‐40. - PubMed
Harvey 2004 {published data only}
    1. Harvey PA, Aitkin M, Ryan GW, Demeter LA, Givens J, Sundararaman R, Goulette S. Strategies to increase smoke alarm use in high‐risk households. Journal of Community Health 2004;29(5):375‐85. - PubMed
Hendrickson 2000 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Hendrickson SL. Effects of a nursing intervention on home safety in a low‐income community. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin 2000.
Jenkins 1996 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Jenkins HML, Blank V, Miller K, Turner J, Stanwick RS. A randomized single‐blind evaluation of a discharge teaching book for pediatric patients with burns. Journal of Burn Care Rehabilitation 1996;17:49‐61. - PubMed
Johnston 2000 {published data only}
    1. Johnston BD, Britt J, D'Ambrosio L, Mueller BA, Rivara FP. A preschool program for safety and injury prevention delivered by home visitors. Injury Prevention 2000;6:305‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Kelly 1987 {published data only}
    1. Kelly B, Sein C, McCarthy PL. Safety education in a pediatric primary care setting. Pediatrics 1987;79:818‐24. - PubMed
Kendrick 1999 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Kendrick D, Hapgood R, Marsh P. Is it only 'safe' families who request home safety checks?. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education 2000;38(4):134‐7.
    1. Kendrick D, Marsh P. Inequalities in receipt of injury prevention in primary care. Health Education Journal 2000;59(2):50‐6.
    1. Kendrick D, Marsh P, Fielding K, Miller P. Preventing injuries in children: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ 1999;318:980‐3. - PMC - PubMed
King 2001 {published and unpublished data}
    1. King WJ, Klassen TP, LeBlanc J, Bernard‐Bonnin AC, Robitaille Y, Pham B, et al. The effectiveness of a home visit to prevent childhood injury. Pediatrics 2001;108(2):382‐8. - PubMed
    1. Klassen TP, King WJ, Beaulne G, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a multi‐faceted home injury intervention in children following an ED visit [abstract]. Program and Abstracts, 38th Annual Meeting of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association, New Orleans, LA, May 1‐5. 1998:40‐41.
LeBailly 1990 {published data only}
    1. LeBailly SA, Freel K, Hicks‐Bartlett S, Kirschenman J, Ritts‐Benally K, Sasicki J. The Children's Safety Research Project. Elk Grove Village, Illinois: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1990.
Mallonee 1996 {published data only}
    1. Douglas MR, Istre GR, Mallonee S. Comparison of community based smoke detector distribution methods in an urban community. Injury Prevention 1998;4(1):28‐32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Douglas MR, Mallonee S, Istre GR. Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: A comparison of telephone survey and household survey results. American Journal of Public Health 1999;89(7):1112‐1114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mallonee S, Istre GR, Rosenberg M, et al. Surveillance and prevention of residential‐fire injuries. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;335:27‐31. - PubMed
Mathews 1988 {published data only}
    1. Mathews JR. An analysis of dangerous behavior in toddlers [Dissertation]. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas, 1988.
McConnell 1996 {published data only}
    1. McConnell CF, Dwyer WO, Leeming FC. A behavioral approach to reducing fires in public housing. Journal of Community Psychology 1996;24:201‐12.
Miller 1982 {published data only}
    1. Miller RE, Reisinger KS, Blatter MM, Wucher F. Pediatric counseling and subsequent use of smoke detectors. American Journal of Public Health 1982;72:392‐3. - PMC - PubMed
Ozanne‐Smith 2002 {published data only}
    1. Ozanne‐Smith J, Day L, Cassell E, Stathakis V, Sherrard J. A controlled evaluation of a community based injury prevention program. Fourth World Conference on Injury Prevention and Control, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 17‐20 May 1998. 1998; Vol. Book of Abstracts, Vol II:856.
    1. Ozanne‐Smith J, Day L, Stathakis V, Sherrad J. Controlled evaluation of a community based injury prevention program ini Australia. Injury Prevention 2002;8:18‐22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ozanne‐Smith J, Sherrard J, Brumen IA, Vulcan P. Community ‐based injury prevention education report: Shire of Bulla Safe Living Program. Vol. Report 66, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Accident Research Centre, 1994.
Ploeg 1994 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Ploeg J, Black ME, Hutchison BG, Walter SD, Scott EAF, Chambers LW. Personal, home and community safety promotion with community‐dwelling elderly persons: response to a public health nurse intervention. Canadian Journal of Public Health 1994;85:188‐91. - PubMed
Project Burn 1979 {published data only}
    1. MacKay AM, Rothman KJ. The incidence and severity of burn injuries following Project Burn Prevention. American Journal of Public Health 1982;72:248‐52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McLoughlin E, Healer C, Healer C. Burn education intervention: a controlled study. Burns 1979;6:26‐29.
    1. McLoughlin E, Vince CJ, Lee AM, Crawford JD. Project Burn Prevention: outcome and implications. American Journal of Public Health 1982;72:241‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Schwarz 1993 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Schwarz DF, Grisso JA, Miles C, Holmes JH, Sutton RL. An injury prevention program in an urban African‐American community. American Journal of Public Health 1993;83:675‐80. - PMC - PubMed
SCIPP 1989 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Bass JL, Mehta KA, Ostrovsky M. Childhood injury prevention in a suburban Massachusetts population. Public Health Report 1991;106:437‐42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guyer B, Gallagher SS, Chang BH, Azzara CV, Cupples LA, Colton T. Prevention of childhood injuries: evaluation of the Statewide Childhood Injury Prevention Program (SCIPP). American Journal of Public Health 1989;79:1521‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Thomas 1984 {published data only}
    1. Thomas KA, Hassanein RS, Christophersen ER. Evaluation of group well‐child care for improving burn prevention practices in the home. Pediatrics 1984;74:879‐82. - PubMed
Watson 2005 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Kendrick D, Watson M, Dewey M, Woods AJ. Does sending a home safety questionnaire increase recruitment to an injury prevention trial? A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2001;55(11):245‐6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson M, Kendrick D, Coupland C. Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial. Injury Prevention 2003;9(2):180‐3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson M, Kendrick D, Coupland C, Woods A, Futers D, Robinson J. Providing child safety equipment to prevent injuries: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005;5:178. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson M, Woods A, Kendrick D. Injury prevention: working together on an RCT. Community Practitioner 2002;75(5):172‐5.
Williams 1988 {published data only}
    1. Williams GE. An analysis of prenatal education classes: an early start to injury prevention [Dissertation]. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas, 1988.

References to studies excluded from this review

Botruff 1992 {published data only}
    1. Botruff T. Fire and Burn Injury Prevention Project: Fort McDowell Indian Reservation. Arizona: Western Arizona District Office, 1992.
Culp 1999 {published data only}
    1. Culp C. Residential smoke detector program distribution priorization and effectiveness measurement. National Fire Academy 1999.
Kendrick 2001 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Kendrick D, Pritchard A, Cloke J, Barley M. Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of increasing information to health visitors about children's injuries. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2001;85:366‐70. - PMC - PubMed
Linyear 1982 {published data only}
    1. Linyear AS. A systems approach to the prevention and treatment of childhood injuries ‐ third year report. Richmond, VA: Bureau of Maternal and Child Health, 1982.
Nunn 1998 {published data only}
    1. Nunn RJ, Alder RG, Parmenter G, Lebnan VM, Laverick J. Primary prevention in firesetting. Russell.Nunn@Med.Monash.Edu.Au 1998.
Petridou 1997 {published data only}
    1. Petridou E, Tolma E, Dessypris N, Trichopoulos D. A controlled evaluation of a community injury prevention project in two Greek islands. International Journal of Epidemiology 1997;26(1):173‐9. [ISSN 0300‐5771] - PubMed
Rowland 2002 {published data only}
    1. Rowland D, DiGuiseppi C, Roberts I, Curtis K, Roberts H, Ginnelly L, et al. Prevalence of working smoke alarms in local authority inner city housing: randomised controlled trial. BMJ Clinical Research Ed 2002;325(7371):998‐1001. - PMC - PubMed
Shults 1998 {published data only}
    1. Shults RA, Sacks JJ, Briske LA, Dickey PH, Kinde MR, Mallonee S, et al. Evaluation of three smoke detector promotion programs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1998;15(3):165‐71. - PubMed
Sundelin 1996 {published data only}
    1. Sundelin C, Rasmussen F, Berfenstam R, Troedsson K. Information through television: does it promote child safety?. Injury Prevention 1996;2(1):36‐40. - PMC - PubMed
Treadwell 2000 {published data only}
    1. Treadwell L. Effectiveness of the Lubbock Fore Department's smoke detecor program. National Fire Academy 2000.
Ytterstad 1998 {published data only}
    1. Ytterstad B, Smith GS, Coggan CA. Harstad injury prevention study: prevention of burns in young children by community based intervention. Injury Prevention 1998;4:176‐80. - PMC - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Azeredo 2003 {published data only}
    1. Azeredo R, Stephens‐Stidham S. Design and implementation of injury prevention curricula for elementary schools: lessons learned. Injury Prevention 2003;9(3):274‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Campbell 2001 {published data only}
    1. Campbell NR, Ayala GX, Litrownik AJ, Slymen DJ, Zavala F, Elder JP. Evaluation of a first aid and home safety program for Hispanic migrant adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2001;20(4):258‐65. - PubMed
Duggan 2004 {published data only}
    1. Duggan A, Fuddy L, Burrell L, Higman SM, McFarlane E, Windham A, Sia C. Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse: impact in reducing parental risk factors. Child Abuse & Neglect 2004;28(6):625‐45. - PubMed
Gong 2001 {published data only}
    1. Gong D. Evaluation of an unintentional injury prevention curriculum for Korean‐American students. [Dissertation]. University of Georgia. United States ‐‐ Georgia, 2001.
Hatfield 2006 {published data only}
    1. Hatfield PM, Staresinic AG, Sorkness CA, Peterson NM, Schirmer J, Katcher ML. Validating self reported home safety practices in a culturally diverse non‐inner city population. Injury Prevention 2006;12(1):52‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Hwang 2006 {published data only}
    1. Hwang V, Duchossois GP, Garcia‐Espana JF, Durbin DR. Impact of a community based fire prevention intervention on fire safety knowledge and behavior in elementary school children. Injury Prevention 2006;12(5):344‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Kendrick 2007 {published data only}
    1. Kendrick D, Groom L, Stewart J, Watson M, Mulvaney C, Casterton R. "Risk Watch'': Cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating an injury prevention program. Injury Prevention 2007;13(2):93‐9. - PMC - PubMed
McDonald 2005 {published data only}
    1. McDonald EM, Solomon B, Shields W, Serwint JR, Jacobsen H, Weaver NL, et al. Evaluation of kiosk‐based tailoring to promote household safety behaviors in an urban pediatric primary care practice. Patient Education and Counseling 2005;58(2):168‐81. - PubMed
Nansel 2002 {published data only}
    1. Nansel TR, Weaver N, Donlin M, Jacobsen H, Kreuter MW, Simons‐Morton B. Baby, Be Safe: The effect of tailored communications for pediatric injury prevention provided in a primary care setting. Patient Education and Counseling 2002;46(3):175‐90. - PMC - PubMed
Peek‐Asa 2005 {published data only}
    1. Peek‐Asa C, Allareddy V, Yang J, Taylor C, Lundell J, Zwerling C. When one is not enough: prevalence and characteristics of homes not adequately protected by smoke alarms. Injury Prevention 2005;11(6):364‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Posner 2004 {published data only}
    1. Posner JC, Hawkins LA, Garcia‐Espana F, Durbin DR. A randomized, clinical trial of a home safety intervention based in an emergency department setting. Pediatrics 2004;113(6):1603‐8. - PubMed
Robertson 2005 {published data only}
    1. Robertson AS, Rivara FP, Ebel BE, Lymp JF, Christakis DA. Validation of parent self reported home safety practices. Injury Prevention 2005;11(4):209‐12. - PMC - PubMed
Sangvai 2007 {published data only}
    1. Sangvai S, Cipriani L, Colborn DK, Wald ER. Studying injury prevention: Practices, problems, and pitfalls in implementation. Clinical Pediatrics 2007;46(3):228‐35. - PubMed
Svanstrom 1995 {published data only}
    1. Svanstrom L, Ekman R, Schelp L, Lindstrom A. The Lidkoping Accident Prevention Programme ‐ a community approach to preventing childhood injuries in Sweden. Injury Prevention 1995;1:169‐72. - PMC - PubMed
Sznajder 2003 {published data only}
    1. Sznajder M, Leduc S, Janvrin MP, Bonnin MH, Aegerter P, Baudier F, Chevallier B. Home delivery of an injury prevention kit for children in four french cities: a controlled randomized trial. Injury Prevention 2003;9(3):261‐5. - PMC - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

Smithson 1998 {published data only}
    1. Smithson RD, Mullan C. Community childhood accident prevention project [abstract]. Book of Abstracts. Fourth World Conference on Injury Prevention and Control, Amsterdam, 17‐20 May 1998, p 373; Vol. 1.

Additional references

Bass 1993
    1. Bass JL, Christoffel KK, Widome M, Boyle W, Scheidt P, Stanwick R, et al. Childhood injury prevention counseling in primary care settings: a critical review of the literature. Paediatrics 1993;92:544‐50. - PubMed
Ciliska 1996
    1. Ciliska D, Hayward S, Thomas H, Mitchell A, Dobbins M, Underwood J, et al. A systematic overview of the effectiveness of home visiting as a delivery strategy for public health nursing intervention. Canadian Journal of Public Health 1996;87:193‐8. - PubMed
DerSimonian 1986
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7:177‐88. - PubMed
Dickersin 1993
    1. Dickersin K, Min YI. NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials 1993;Apr 28:Doc No 50. - PubMed
Dickersin 1994
    1. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309:1286‐91. - PMC - PubMed
DiGuiseppi 1998a
    1. DiGuiseppi C, Roberts I, Li L. Smoke alarm ownership and house fire death rates in children. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 1998;52:760‐1. - PMC - PubMed
Easterbrook 1991
    1. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337:867‐72. - PubMed
Fire Statistics UK
    1. Fire Statistics, United Kingdom, 2005. Department of Communities and Local Government. London, 2007.
First World Cf 1989
    1. First World Conference on Accident and Injury Prevention, Stockholm, Sweden. 17‐20 September 1989.
Fourth World Cf 1998
    1. Fourth World Conference on Injury Prevention and Control, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 17‐20 May 1998.
Harborview MC 1997
    1. Harborview Medical Center Injury Prevention and Research Center. Systematic reviews of childhood injury prevention interventions. http://depts.washington.edu/hiprc/childinjury/ Updated 20 July 1997.
Hauck 1991
    1. Hauck WW, Gilliss CL, Donner A, Gortner S. Randomization by cluster. Nursing Research 1991;40:356‐8. - PubMed
Kulenkamp 1994
    1. Kulenkamp A, Lundquist B, Schaenman P. Reaching the hard‐to‐reach: techniques from fire prevention programs and other disciplines. Arlington, VA. TriData Corporation, 1994.
Marshall 1998
    1. Marshall SW, Runyan CW, Bangdiwala SI, Linzer MA, Sacks JJ, Butts JD. Fatal residential fires: who dies and who survives?. JAMA 1998;279:1633‐7. - PubMed
Munro 1995
    1. Munro J, Coleman P, Nicholl J, Harper R, Kent G, Wild D. Can we prevent accidental injury to adolescents? A systematic review of the evidence. Injury Prevention 1995;1:249‐55. - PMC - PubMed
Murray 1994
    1. Murray DM, Rooney BL, Hannan PJ, Peterson AV, Ary DV, Biglan A, et al. Intraclass correlation among common measures of adolescent smoking: estimates, correlates, and applications in smoking prevention studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 1994;140:1038‐50. - PubMed
National Center 1996
    1. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Efforts to increase smoke detector use in US households: an inventory of programs. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996.
NFPA 2006
    1. Fire Loss in the U.S. during 2005. National Fire Protection Association 2006.
Peden 2002
    1. Peden M, McGee K, Sharma G. The injury chart book: a graphical overview of the global burden of injuries. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.
Roberts 1996
    1. Roberts I. Smoke alarm use: prevalence and household predictors. Injury Prevention 1996;2:263‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Runyan 1992
    1. Runyan CW, Bangdiwala SI, Linzer MA, Sacks JJ, Butts J. Risk factors for fatal residential fires. New England Journal of Medicine 1992;327:859‐63. - PubMed
Schaenman 1990
    1. Schaenman P, Stambaugh H, Rossomando C, Jennings C, Perroni C. Proving public fire education works. Arlington, VA: TriData Corporation, 1990.
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273:408‐12. - PubMed
Second World Cf 1993
    1. Second World Conference on Injury Control, Atlanta, Georgia. 20‐23 May 1993.
Third I Cf 1996
    1. Third International Conference on Injury Prevention and Control, Melbourne, Australia. 18‐22 February 1996.
Towner 1996
    1. Towner E, Simpson G, Jarvis S, Dowswell T (ed). Health promotion in childhood and young adolescence for the prevention of unintentional injuries. London: Health Education Authority, 1996.
Towner 2001a
    1. Towner E, Dowswell T, Jarvis S. Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 1. Injury Prevention 2001;7:161‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Towner 2001b
    1. Towner E, Dowswell T, Jarvis S. Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 2. Injury Prevention 2001;7:249‐53. - PMC - PubMed
US Fire 1993
    1. US Fire Administration. Directory of national community volunteer fire prevention program community‐based fire prevention education initiatives: 1984‐1992. Emmitsburg, MD: US Fire Administration, 1993.
US Task Force 1996
    1. US Prevention Task Force. Counseling to prevent household and recreational injuries. In: DiGuiseppi C, Atkins D, Woolf S, Kamerow D editor(s). Guide to clinical preventive services. 2nd Edition. Washington DC: US Government Priniting Office, 1996:659‐85.
Warda 1999
    1. Warda L, Tenenbein M, Moffatt MEK. House fire injury prevention update. Part II. A review of the effectiveness of preventive interventions. Injury Prevention 1999;5:217‐225. - PMC - PubMed
Watson 1999
    1. Watson L, Gamble J. Fire statistics: United Kingdom 1998. Home Office Statistical Bulletin. Vol. 15/99, London UK: Government Statistical Service, 1999.

References to other published versions of this review

DiGuiseppi 2000
    1. DiGuiseppi C, Higgins JPT. Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms. Arch Dis Child 2000;82:341‐8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources